A few ? About my NT scan

[babydust]

Hi again! So I wanted to see if you girls could shed some
Light on these lingering questions of mine.

* Ok, so not positive about where the nub is. Is it that bright white line? I also see something a bit higher up which I also think looks flat. Can anyone circle what they think the nub is? I really do think it is that bright white line lower down, as I saw it during the live ultrasound as well

* I think the skull looks very girlie, right?

* Have you ever had a scan at around 13 weeks and 3 or 4 days? If it was a boy, did you see something sticking out a little? At the very least, I think it is a really good sign th
at nothing at all was protruding out. Potty area looked very flat

* Another thing is that, the tech looked at the potty shot at least 3 different times and saw absolutely nothing sticking out. At the very end she saw ONE WHITE DOT in that area. No bumps at all, whatsoever. She showed me and said it could go either way ( turn into girl parts or boy parts). That there
was no way of knowing yet. Has anyone experience this?

* And last questions is...do you see those three lines in the potty shot? I know it's dark and blurry but I also thought I saw them during the live ultrasound as well

Will add some pics below as I tried to get some light into these pictures. My other scans are in my 13 + 3 weeks ultrasound post. I go in for my 16 weeks scan in two weeks.
Ahh!

Thanks again!!!


Is the nub the white thing or a little higher one, in picture below...


http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/DC935F95-0694-4E04-9CAF-C5EF1BFB470C-152-0000006AE9F0669E.jpg

http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/F7C02F1D-52E4-44ED-BA9D-5FC7B1516552-152-0000002DD6D281BE.jpg


Potty shot below, legs are in a C shape

http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/239E2D12-B855-41D2-8F7C-CF5E2762814A-152-0000006AFC636510.jpg

http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/879B701F-011F-46D8-9501-ABEB280B0A8B-152-0000003172E78427.jpg

I think the skull is more of a girl shape, yeah?

http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/B31F6FBE-1D7A-4DD9-B715-7DF71A3A79AA-152-00000014EFAF95A1.jpg

http://i996.photobucket.com/albums/af85/babydust292/325A25B0-2F08-470F-9A84-504448EE9E45-152-0000001CA3323B78.jpg

Thanks!!!!

[atomic sagebrush]

I can't see a thing on these, I'm sorry, but I did want to let you know that I felt gender was obvious at my 13+ 5/6 scans with both DS 4 and DD. DS 4 DEF. had a willy and DD def. did not. And I had looked at very few ultrasounds at that point even and could still tell.

Did the tech give you any cues? With DS the tech was kind of downtrodden and apologetic and with DD the tech got super excited and started calling 'he' (she had been calling baby a HE at the beginning of the exam) 'she'.

[babydust]

Thanks atomic!! Well, the tech was very nice and she did say that she didn't see anything at all between the legs. Except for at the end when she told me she saw one white dot in that area ( not a bump at all, just a dot) and that it could totally go either way. She didn't know about the nub theory but did look between the legs at least three times and saw absolutely nothing protruding and neither did I. I had my scans with my boy and girl at around 12 weeks and 4 days so o never went in this far along for the NT scan. I was measuring 14 weeks and 1 day but I was most likely 13 weeks and 4 days. Which, I also agree, I pretty far along to not see "something" between the legs if it were a boy.

Thanks you for sharing your experience and thoughts atomic!! :)

[deaks66]

i don't think the bright white line is the nub. It is too low down and too far into the body. The nub would be higher and further to the right so i don't think you can tell gender from these shots unfortunately. FX for your girl though :)

[babydust]

Ok thanks! I'm just thankful that I didn't see any boy parts at all in the potty shot ;)

[Cinss]

I think girl

[babydust]

Thanks so much for your feedback so far!!

[lovemy4]

I don't see a nub in your pics and the ones between the legs don't seem to quite focus on the genitals.