View Full Version : POTTY SHOT- WAS TOLD GIRL BY TECH- BUT NOW IN DOUBT 18 WEEKS AND 5 DAYS. PLEASE HELP
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 12:00 AM
ATTENTION TURTLE PLEASE HELP - I NEED YOUR THOUGHTS
HI LADIES I WAS TOLD ITS A GIRL AT OUR SCAN. BUT NOW IN DOUBT AS ANOTHER TECH ON ANOTHER FORUM HAS STATED IT MIGHT BE A GIRL 7810AS ITS NOT A CLEAR PICTURE.... I BELIEVE ITS CLEAR HOWEVER I REALLY NEED VOTES!! WHAT DO U THINK? HELP
love-my-kids
January 9th, 2013, 12:18 AM
looks like a girl to me!
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 12:31 AM
Was told by a tech on ingender it's not a clear picture and its too early to guess at 18 weeks and 5 days :( to be honest I'm shocked as I've been so over the moon with happiness it's a girl :(
Cinss
January 9th, 2013, 12:55 AM
I dont think a tech would be saying its too early at 18 weeks, either its not a tech or they are blind.
jark22
January 9th, 2013, 12:57 AM
I didn't want to reply on your other post- but I don't think this was the best 'girl' shot that I've seen. The legs look too close together - and it looks like it 'could' be squished boy bits. Did they give you any other potty shot pictures?
jark22
January 9th, 2013, 12:58 AM
Also- it's not too early to guess at 18.5 weeks.......but there have been girls on here told one gender at their 16-18 week scan and then the opposite gender at their 20 week scan. It all depends on how good your tech was who did the ultrasound.
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 01:27 AM
during ultrasound baby was very easy to work with. She got all measurements easy and legs were apart... There are 3 white lines... There was no issue getting a picture but this is the only picture as I asked for this as proof to post on this forum. Everyone has said girl except one person who I believe to be experienced . I thought this was a clear picture compared to other pictures as I've look at confirmed pics and googled images. When I put my picture up against a boy image there is nothing between the legs....
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 01:29 AM
If u zoom in on the picture u will see there is a gap between the legs.... boys don't have gaps!!
jark22
January 9th, 2013, 01:58 AM
This is the only picture I've seen similar to yours. Hers was confirmed boy- but I think the baby was also only 16 weeks or so. I hope that is your girl! When do you have another scan?
Here's the comparison- yours is on the left. See how the other one has the legs further apart?
7812
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 02:43 AM
there 2 pics look very different
Violet_
January 9th, 2013, 04:05 AM
I vote girl!
Cinss
January 9th, 2013, 04:11 AM
There are def 3 lines on your pic
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 04:38 AM
I think it's a girl till I got a comment doubting it so I'm now confused :( cause we have bought some girl stuff
hopingforsaskia
January 9th, 2013, 04:39 AM
It's a girl... Don't stress. That's a for sure 100% girl. Especially if the tech that did it said girl -- she was obviously looking the whole time and saw nothing indicating a boy. It's almost impossible to discredit her conclusion based on one photo. Congratulations on your daughter! :)
Littlemo
January 9th, 2013, 08:40 AM
Looks girly!
nuthinbutpink
January 9th, 2013, 09:13 AM
The legs are really close together. 18 weeks certainly isn't too early but this just isn't the best shot. I'm sure your tech got a good view during the live scan and a penis should have been very obvious when baby opened its legs.
Flava
January 9th, 2013, 09:31 AM
That's a GIRL for sure!
lovemy4
January 9th, 2013, 09:42 AM
Sometimes it's just hard to snap a still picture. Trust the tech. It's a girl!
Inky
January 9th, 2013, 10:46 AM
Definitely girl, vik! congrats!
Life In Pink
January 9th, 2013, 11:27 AM
I think it's a girl! I'd trust your tech as she saw more than just this picture. It's not the best girl picture but I still think girl! Can you go get another scan just for re-assurance?
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 04:44 PM
Thanks everyone yes I was watching scan as well and I didn't see boy parts
The Anchor
January 9th, 2013, 04:54 PM
Girl (and who/what is "turtle"?)
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 04:55 PM
Haha turtle is a sonographer from baby centre. She is very experienced.. I write on wrong website lol
vikbub
January 9th, 2013, 05:05 PM
this sonographer has given me alot of time and kept me sane during the whole way through. i just thought she was one thie forum but wasnt. im on 3 forums and got confused. silly me...
NYC_CNM
July 27th, 2013, 01:52 PM
Looks like a girl to me. I see three (if slightly squished) lines, and nothing protruding past the body of the baby, like it would in a boy. At 18 weeks a penis would be a lot more obvious. I'm not claiming to be an expert (and I'm not a sono tech!), but I am a midwife and I look at these things fairly regularly. If you were a client in our office, I would say 80% certain it's a girl.
Coyleof7
July 27th, 2013, 09:12 PM
:princess:
very much girl xx
vickyaust
July 27th, 2013, 10:37 PM
Girl. Congratulations.
monkeysnuffer
August 28th, 2013, 01:15 PM
MY doctor told me that 18-20 weeks is ideal for guessing, so I think you can be confident it's a girl.
I'm not an expert, but it looks girl to me!
3littleladies
August 28th, 2013, 09:38 PM
GIRL, GIRL, GIRL!
myrainbowgirl
August 29th, 2013, 01:12 AM
What did you end up having?? Gotta admit I'm slightly on the fence with this one, on one hand I totally see the hamburger, but on the other, I totally see the outline of a little turtle shot! Anyone else see what I'm talking about??
Bettylisset
September 8th, 2013, 12:05 AM
I saw it still confuse about thr pic I vote 50/50
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.