It's a girl right?

[glory]

I had a 3d scan at 14 weeks and the tech said girl, this was not a true ultrasound place just really somewhere to get pics from. Would like a later definate confirmation.

Anyway I had fetal anatomy at 17 weeks and then at 23 weeks cause had to check some things and they will probably be the last scans I have. Both times the lady (same one) said she couldn't tell. First time the hand was between the legs and second the legs were shut.

I think she was just being a bit of a b***h. She had a really good look both times and still wouldn't say.

So I took some photos of my 17 week video, I can see girl, why couldn't she? (you can see the hand in the first ones I think? So she was saying the truth there)

8761
8762
Is this the 3 white lines?
8763
8764

[Violet_]

Top and bottom pics look like a hand and fingers. But I do think you pics look girly.

[Rainbow baby]

I think they look girly too I don't see anything sticking out but I don't see girl stuff either!

[jark22]

I don't see parts for either gender in these pictures. I think they are taken too far back.......

[glory]

This is where she was looking for ages, this is a really, really good clinic for U/S. Could she just not want to tell me? Who would do that? Weird at both she couldn't 'see' when I did the 3D place at 14 weeks, she saw the sex within 1 minute.

[nuthinbutpink]

glory, it IS a girl! These pictures are not great because you see a lot of the backside but it is a girl!

[glory]

OMG NBP, you made me laugh so much, I know I am being an idiot, but I just don't know why she would be looking in the wrong spot, I went to these people cause they are good!

She made it seem like she was having a good look too!

Maybe she knew I did PGD (I told them at the NT scan) and was just being rude about it!

[Inky]

looks girly to me, but I see why the pic was confusing! congrats!

[Hilda]

I dont see any boy parts. Gl to you. :)