atomic sagebrush
September 2nd, 2011, 12:24 PM
Unless you are very very tiny (like under 5 feet tall and already eat 1500-1800 calories and have boys) or have a lot of weight to lose, please, please, I beg of you, stick with the 1500-1800 calorie guideline. That is the amount of calories advised for weight loss for those going high tech. When you drop below that and stay there for a long time, you will end up suppressing your fertility and it is going to take you several weeks to O. It will sway pink and I PROMISE to the point of swearing on the Bible, that you WILL O eventually and it will not affect your fertility in the long term, but will take you a long time to get pregnant that way.
If you are sold on the idea of superlow calories and make a decision to eat 1200-1500, PLEASE do whatever it takes to get pg quickly. No timing, no jellies, no lowering sperm count. I do not think it's a good idea or healthy to eat 1000-1200 calories FOR ANYONE and esp. not for 6 weeks prior to TTC. If you want to go the superlow route, eat at least 1200-1500 calories and get pg RIGHT AWAY. Don't do the full 6 weeks on the diet at very low caloric intake (unless you're really heavy and can stand to lose a lot of weight.)
Remember, the guidelines for the Low-Everything diet is:
1500-1800 calories
40-50 g protein
20-30% calories from fat fat
700-1000 mg sodium
When I was researching this diet, these were the numbers that are low enough to lower your blood sugar, shrink your muscles, and be doable in the long term, while subtly suppressing your fertility without making it go away all together.
The Low-Everything diet is actually quite healthy and most doctors would be very supportive of such a diet. I just don't want anyone to carry it to extremes becasue anything taken to extreme, is, well, extreme.
It's always better to start off with MORE food and then cut back than to start off really restrictive and have nowhere to go over the course of time. If you start off superrestrictive and find that you stop ovulating, you'll end up having to eat more and ~might~ end up undoing some of the good you did.
Best strategy would be to start off on the upper limit of diet and doing a lot of other things to sway and then just seeing what happens. If you don't get pregnant, you will have the experience needed to know what to toss and what to keep and if your weight plateaus, you have room to cut back.
If you are sold on the idea of superlow calories and make a decision to eat 1200-1500, PLEASE do whatever it takes to get pg quickly. No timing, no jellies, no lowering sperm count. I do not think it's a good idea or healthy to eat 1000-1200 calories FOR ANYONE and esp. not for 6 weeks prior to TTC. If you want to go the superlow route, eat at least 1200-1500 calories and get pg RIGHT AWAY. Don't do the full 6 weeks on the diet at very low caloric intake (unless you're really heavy and can stand to lose a lot of weight.)
Remember, the guidelines for the Low-Everything diet is:
1500-1800 calories
40-50 g protein
20-30% calories from fat fat
700-1000 mg sodium
When I was researching this diet, these were the numbers that are low enough to lower your blood sugar, shrink your muscles, and be doable in the long term, while subtly suppressing your fertility without making it go away all together.
The Low-Everything diet is actually quite healthy and most doctors would be very supportive of such a diet. I just don't want anyone to carry it to extremes becasue anything taken to extreme, is, well, extreme.
It's always better to start off with MORE food and then cut back than to start off really restrictive and have nowhere to go over the course of time. If you start off superrestrictive and find that you stop ovulating, you'll end up having to eat more and ~might~ end up undoing some of the good you did.
Best strategy would be to start off on the upper limit of diet and doing a lot of other things to sway and then just seeing what happens. If you don't get pregnant, you will have the experience needed to know what to toss and what to keep and if your weight plateaus, you have room to cut back.