View Full Version : Weeks 16
ib_85
June 16th, 2013, 10:15 AM
Hello,
We went for our week 16 checkup on our twins and the doctor guessed the gender. I attached two pictures i am not sure if those are both for the same baby or both. He did not label them baby A and baby B so i can't tell. Given the attached pictures, what is your guess?
Thanks,
nuthinbutpink
June 16th, 2013, 10:17 AM
Look like they are both girls. They're very dark but that's what I think I see.
3blue?pink
June 16th, 2013, 11:42 AM
I agree the pics are dark but they do both look to be girly
hotdogz&boyz
June 16th, 2013, 02:26 PM
First pic looks rather girly to me. Second I am not certain. Looks more girl than boy though. If the tech said two girls, I think it's prolly two girls :)
FiveDiamonds
June 16th, 2013, 05:36 PM
Looks like 2 girls!
meeks32
June 16th, 2013, 07:19 PM
First pic girl, second too dark to see. I thought boy but I really can't tell. What were you hoping for?
ib_85
June 16th, 2013, 07:38 PM
First ultra sound at 11 weeks the doc guessed 1 girl and 1 boy, but was not sure about the boy. The second scan at 13 weeks 1 girl and the other had legs crossed. 3rd time at 16 weeks which was few days ago we saw another doc at the same clinic as our doc was not available and he said 2 girls. Funny, he asked us after the second one what did the other doctor say? I said boy. He said oh well i see two girls and i am 95% sure. We were really hoping for a boy and a girl. As long as the babies are healthy, we are happy :)
meeks32
June 16th, 2013, 07:58 PM
That's frustrating isn't it! But at 16 weeks it would be far more accurate than the previously. Do you have any other scans coming up to confirm? Did you sway?
Violet_
June 16th, 2013, 08:01 PM
From what I can make out. Both look girly.
ib_85
June 16th, 2013, 08:08 PM
I am starting to beleive that both are girls :) Can readings change afterwords or is 16 weeks accurate? Why did the doctor say 95% and not 99 or 100% if he was so sure?
Minki4
June 16th, 2013, 08:16 PM
Hi, scans are never 100%, we were told at our 20 week scan we were having a girl, arrived very much a boy - dressed in pink however :wink:
ib_85
June 16th, 2013, 09:13 PM
i took picture two again with flash. To me, this picture looks more like a boy. The other one is deifnetly a girl. What do you guys think? Is this pic more clear and what's your opinion?
beachbubs
June 16th, 2013, 09:28 PM
First pic definitely girl & second pic is hard to tell, but their is definitely no obvious boy parts.....I would be pretty confident if the doc said 95% sure it was two girls :) congrats!!
meeks32
June 16th, 2013, 11:09 PM
16 week is reasonably reliable, 20 weeks is better. With twins it's always a little difficult as they are more squashed in and can be harder to get in the right position for a clear shot. 95% is pretty high assurance, and the tech would have seen a lot more than us live rather than from pics.
ib_85
June 17th, 2013, 01:43 PM
Hotdogz&Boys and Meeks32 did you see the new picture that i uploaded (post 7)? It is a little brighter. Please let me know what you think?
wilma_five
June 17th, 2013, 03:18 PM
:DD::DD:
meeks32
June 17th, 2013, 06:04 PM
Yes I did, still not. Very clear shot in the first place so I still can't tell. But think trust the tech. Are you likely to have a scan at 20 weeks?
Foxy
June 17th, 2013, 07:07 PM
I would go with what your Tech told you. Congratulations on the twins!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.