12w4d scan - Hope I'm wrong but I don't think nub is visible. Can anyone confirm?

[sininen]

I can't discern any nub here but then I'm a beginner at this (first child!). It looks to be the nub might be obscured or hidden by baby's legs? Does anyone see anything I'm missing?

17105

[shellbell34]

Going by the forehead I would guess boy just a guess though

[bunnywabbit]

Thinking I *might* see something on the 2nd picture. If so, leaning boy. Congrats! x

[sininen]

shellbell34: interesting! I haven't looked much into the forehead/skull theory. Does it have a good track record for gender guessing?

bunnywabbit: thank you for your guess, a boy is what I swayed for. Fingers x'ed.

[aidansmum]

Can't see a nub, but skull looks very boyish!

[hotdogz&boyz]

To me, it looks like baby's hips are rolled slightly toward the screen and the hip is obscuring the nub. My sons sono was like that...so fingers crossed for a boy! Lol.

[sininen]

hotdogz&boyz: Good point, I didn't notice that before but now I can see it. So this would mean that the visible leg in the picture is baby's right leg? All this time I was assuming it was the left leg (this is how inexperienced I am at this, haha) which would mean the groin area would be completely blocked. But if that's baby's right leg and the hips are slightly turned toward the screen then you can kind of see a partial nub or little protuberance of some kind between the legs. I hope that's a good sign but then again I understand that male and female nubs/protuberances tend to look a bit alike this early in the game, no?