PDA

View Full Version : Luteul Phase and Vitex Q



Sassy
July 29th, 2011, 06:48 AM
Just a quick one I hope someone might know the answer to. As you know I had perfect cycles before going to town on the supps! So this cycle I O'd on CD15 instead of CD14 which was fine, but AF has arrived today CD27 putting my LP at only 12 days instead of 14. Is this a problem? Could this be due to Saw Palmetto or Vitex?

Any insights would be apprecited!

rainbowflower
July 29th, 2011, 10:19 AM
it isn't necessarily a problem. I have an 11 day LP (without taking supps), and I conceived twice with that both times within 3 months of TTC

atomic sagebrush
July 29th, 2011, 01:36 PM
No, a 12 day LP is perfectly fine for conceiving. 12-14 days is ample time for a bean to implant.

XXdreaming
July 29th, 2011, 01:39 PM
yeah 12 lp is fine to conceive a healthy pregnancy, but I thought vitex was to raise progesterone and kind of help your lp?

ttcboy2011
July 29th, 2011, 02:02 PM
I sometimes have a LP of 10-11 days and wonder if that's normal. I hope so...

atomic sagebrush
July 29th, 2011, 02:23 PM
I sometimes have a LP of 10-11 days and wonder if that's normal. I hope so...

That is a bit on the short side...you might want to take some B6 to lengthen it. You should still be able to get pg, but it's not as sure of a thing as with a 12-14 day LP.

atomic sagebrush
July 29th, 2011, 02:28 PM
yeah 12 lp is fine to conceive a healthy pregnancy, but I thought vitex was to raise progesterone and kind of help your lp?

Vitex can help with LP but whenever you alter your hormone balance, the results can be unpredictable.

zanacal
July 29th, 2011, 04:43 PM
How do you count your LP - is it the number of days after O you get AF or the number of days in between O and AF (not including either!)?! Also, if you had say a 28 day cycle would you get AF on CD28 or on CD27? I suspect I've been counting my cycle length wrong all these years!

atomic sagebrush
July 30th, 2011, 11:21 AM
Follicular phase is AF-O and it can vary in number of days dramatically without affecting your ability to get pg. You can have many weeks, even months or years between AF and O and still be capable of getting pregnant.

Luteal phase is O-AF and it should be between 12-14 days for best odds of pg. The fertilized egg takes a certain amount of time to move into the uterus from the Fallopian tubes and implant, and if your LP is any shorter than 12-14 days, it may not have enough time to implant and begin producing the hormones that keep the lining from disintegrating. When this happens, it's a chemical pregnancy...the egg tried to implant, enough so you even may have gotten a pos pg test, but something went wrong and the egg was shed with your uterine lining.

Unfortunately, even having a 28 day cycle, you can still have a short LP. If you O on CD 18,19,20 and then get AF on CD 28, you will have a short LP of only 8-10 days which is not usually enough time for the egg to successfully implant.

When counting days, you include the days of AF (so CD 1 is the first day of REAL bleeding, not spotting) and start counting your LP the day after O.

zanacal
July 30th, 2011, 01:17 PM
Thanks for the information Atomic - so in a 28 day cycle you get AF on day 29 (which becomes day 1 of the next cycle) and the number of days in your LP are the number of days before AF (not including the day you get AF)? I think I've asked badly again, I hope it makes some sense!

atomic sagebrush
July 30th, 2011, 03:27 PM
Yes! I understood that and the answer is yes.

zanacal
July 30th, 2011, 04:00 PM
Excellent - in that case scrap what I've said in the past about having a regular 28 day cycle, it was a regular 27 day cycle :D

Sassy
July 31st, 2011, 06:33 AM
Thanks so much for the replies - I feel much better knowing 12 day LP is ok. I'm actually wondering if I may have had a chemical this month which may be why AF came a day early. I got a +OPK 2 days before AF after a dip in temps and noticable pains - I thought my cycle was stuffed and I may be Oing. But then AF arrived a day earlier than expected. Who knows!

atomic sagebrush
July 31st, 2011, 01:32 PM
Yes, I'm sorry, that does sound like a chemical to me as well.

Sassy
August 1st, 2011, 05:43 AM
I thought so. We weren't actually trying last month, however in hindsight it would have been a pretty good sway! At least vitex isn't the culprit.

atomic sagebrush
August 1st, 2011, 11:26 AM
I'm sorry Sassy. :(