Complete PINK Swaying Statistics Spreadsheet Info and Links to enter your sway

[atomic sagebrush]

I love looking at stats!! [emoji7] thank you so much for doing this! Have u ever thought of creating a questionnaire?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes we have our questionnaires here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/add-your-girl-sway-/

The stats are great but before you guys put very much stock into them please read this post where I go over my thinking on the results. https://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/43555-thoughts-stats.html

[sam107]

Oh how silly of me [emoji85] only new to the site [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[atomic sagebrush]

No not at all, I'm glad you asked! I'm here to answer all questions so please don't hesitate. :)

[blueeyedguys]

Updated. Sorry I'm so late this month. My reminder never went.

4 new sways since last update.

[blueeyedguys]

Updated. 7 new sways.

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you so much!! You are a superstar!!

[blueeyedguys]

Updated. Only 2 new sways added in the last month. Slow month or are people forgetting to add them, I wonder.

[atomic sagebrush]

I've been telling people to add them - if you're reading this and haven't added your sway, please do!

Thanks a million blueeyedguys!

[atomic sagebrush]

JJ66 accidentally filled out that she had 3 attempts but she really had one attempt.

[blueeyedguys]

JJ66 accidentally filled out that she had 3 attempts but she really had one attempt.

Was this recently? The only JJ66 I can find in the spreadsheet is from awhile ago with only 1 attempt showing and resulting in a boy.

Stats are updated. 7 new sways.

[atomic sagebrush]

Was this recently? The only JJ66 I can find in the spreadsheet is from awhile ago with only 1 attempt showing and resulting in a boy.

Stats are updated. 7 new sways.

Yes she swayed a second time. Maybe she deleted her info, I'll ask her. Thank you!!

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated. 3 new sways since last update.

[Nell_]

Thank you!! 💕

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you so much blue!! I SO appreciate it!

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated. 1 new sway added since last update.

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you!

Hey, everyone who hasn't added your data to our spreadsheet, please help us and add your information!

[Jessirberger]

Orgasm
Total Sways:41
Total Success:31
Total Success %:75.61%
Inverse success %

Does this statistic refer to women NOT orgasming? Or to them ignoring the girl sway recommendation and having orgasms anyway?

[atomic sagebrush]

I don't know. I hope when blue (who kindly keeps the stats for us) comes back to update she can clarify, but it may be that the question is, in itself confusing in the results and is not going to be reliable for that reason. That was fairly recently added I believe so it may not be reliable anyway. You see, our results have been quite high the last two years and so things added during that time period may be piggybacking on the recent high results, while things that were added in the past - when our results were lower for a variety of reasons we've now corrected - may actually be artificially lower than they should be, if that make ssense. (and if it doesn't make sense let me know, I'll clarify. stats are confusing)

[PadrePioidevotemyfirstson]

Hello is there a blue stat page? Thanks you x


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[atomic sagebrush]

We haven't had enough volunteers to do the blue stats plan to this level, unfortunately.

[Jessirberger]

I don't know. I hope when blue (who kindly keeps the stats for us) comes back to update she can clarify, but it may be that the question is, in itself confusing in the results and is not going to be reliable for that reason. That was fairly recently added I believe so it may not be reliable anyway. You see, our results have been quite high the last two years and so things added during that time period may be piggybacking on the recent high results, while things that were added in the past - when our results were lower for a variety of reasons we've now corrected - may actually be artificially lower than they should be, if that make ssense. (and if it doesn't make sense let me know, I'll clarify. stats are confusing)I think I followed that, thanks! Can I ask what was making the stats artificially high recently and low in the past?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[atomic sagebrush]

They're not artificially high recently. We figured out a couple things we were doing wrong during the early days - mainly the one attempt - and corrected for that. So things that we were tracking back when our results were lower might appear to be lower than they actually are because the lower results from the early days of the site bring them down.

And things that we only just added post-fixing-one-attempt, may ~seem~ to be crazy high compared to other things but that may not be legitimate. If our overall success is 70%, it only takes one or two lucky sways - depending on sample size - to make it look insanely effective when really it's not helping too awfully much.

I'll give a mathy example below.

[atomic sagebrush]

Orgasm
Total Sways:41
Total Success:31
Total Success %:75.61%
Inverse success %

Does this statistic refer to women NOT orgasming? Or to them ignoring the girl sway recommendation and having orgasms anyway?

So when we look at numbers like this, with a fairly small sample size (not to mention that people may have been confused as to what they were even saying...orgasm or not, we aren't certain...but setting that aside to illustrate what I'm saying about the recently added statistics)

31 of 41 is 75%
30 of 41 is 73%
29 of 41 is 71%
28 of 41 is 68%

So if just from sheer chance, 3 sways would have gone the other way, that puts us down in about the overall ballpark of the success of the site. And since this question was recently added, since these results have been only registered during the point in time where our overall results are in the 66-70% range, that handful of lucky sways make it appear sky high. Whereas if we'd been tracking since 2011 our baseline would be lower, and it wouldn't look like anything right now. Like, if you look at "old wives tales" for instance, we know that putting a little dress under the bed doesn't really do anything of course, but it's still sitting at 64% - piggybacking on the success of the site, but still being brought down by the earlier lower results (and with a wayyy higher sample size too.)

My point in all this is that we just have to take these stats with a pretty big grain of salt because they're misleading in lots of different ways. Some people just want to go through and do anything that seems like it gets better than 50-50, but many of these things very likely don't even do anything and aren't worth stressing over. I have a long thread where I talk about the limitations of the stats in mindnumbing detail here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/43555-thoughts-stats.html

[PadrePioidevotemyfirstson]

Thank you for taking time to explain :)

[Jessirberger]

So when we look at numbers like this, with a fairly small sample size (not to mention that people may have been confused as to what they were even saying...orgasm or not, we aren't certain...but setting that aside to illustrate what I'm saying about the recently added statistics)

31 of 41 is 75%
30 of 41 is 73%
29 of 41 is 71%
28 of 41 is 68%

So if just from sheer chance, 3 sways would have gone the other way, that puts us down in about the overall ballpark of the success of the site. And since this question was recently added, since these results have been only registered during the point in time where our overall results are in the 66-70% range, that handful of lucky sways make it appear sky high. Whereas if we'd been tracking since 2011 our baseline would be lower, and it wouldn't look like anything right now. Like, if you look at "old wives tales" for instance, we know that putting a little dress under the bed doesn't really do anything of course, but it's still sitting at 64% - piggybacking on the success of the site, but still being brought down by the earlier lower results (and with a wayyy higher sample size too.)

My point in all this is that we just have to take these stats with a pretty big grain of salt because they're misleading in lots of different ways. Some people just want to go through and do anything that seems like it gets better than 50-50, but many of these things very likely don't even do anything and aren't worth stressing over. I have a long thread where I talk about the limitations of the stats in mindnumbing detail here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/43555-thoughts-stats.htmlFyi, I just looked at the question form and the stats on orgasm are referring to ppl saying "yes" to having orgasms in their sway. [emoji322][emoji322][emoji106]

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[chelsearogene]

Hello! I am wondering, is there a place we can view swayers previous children’s genders (IE: mom of 3 boys sways pink for number 4) and the result of the sway?

[blueeyedguys]

Orgasm
Total Sways:41
Total Success:31
Total Success %:75.61%
Inverse success %

Does this statistic refer to women NOT orgasming? Or to them ignoring the girl sway recommendation and having orgasms anyway?

The question in the form is Did you have an orgasm for your successful attempt. Answer choices are yes/no. So this stat is reflecting that 75% of those responded had an orgasm for their successful attempt.

Stats are updated. 16 new sways added.

[blueeyedguys]

Hello! I am wondering, is there a place we can view swayers previous children’s genders (IE: mom of 3 boys sways pink for number 4) and the result of the sway?

Only by looking them up & seeing if they have it in their signature or mentioned it on the board in their sway attempt post.

[atomic sagebrush]

Hello! I am wondering, is there a place we can view swayers previous children’s genders (IE: mom of 3 boys sways pink for number 4) and the result of the sway?

we probably should have included this from day one but it didn't occur to us. But yes like BEG says you can always go and look people up to see their signatures, but to be honest I believe that would only serve to undermine your pink sway anyway as it's all very "control freaky" and probably wouldn't shed any light anyway.

We have people on here swaying for their first and people on here swaying for their 6th, and most fall somewhere in between. I think we have a pretty good sample of people with different gender makeups of their kiddos so I think this is quite representative of what the average person can expect regardless of how many boys or girls they've had before.

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated. 10 new sways since last update.

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you so much! And thanks to everyone who added their data!

[Joeyk44]

I may have missed it somewhere but are there stats for using Femara? Can only see Clomid here.

[atomic sagebrush]

They're lumped in together. We have a study (which is MUCH better quality data than our stats) that shows Femara is more pink friendly than Clomid so I rely on that to prove Femara sways. :)

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated. 7 new sways since the last update.

[atomic sagebrush]

Stats updated. 7 new sways since the last update.

Thank you so much! The elusive 70% remains just out of reach - if you have a sway you haven't added to the stats success or opposie please add them!

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated. 5 new sways added since last update.

[blueeyedguys]

Stats updated.

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you!!! I have not forgotten about finding someone to take over this job, I have had a couple people who didn't pan out. Let me know if you can't do it any more and I'll take over, although I'd prefer not to do it myself I can if you can't bear it any longer. :heart:

[blueeyedguys]

Thank you!!! I have not forgotten about finding someone to take over this job, I have had a couple people who didn't pan out. Let me know if you can't do it any more and I'll take over, although I'd prefer not to do it myself I can if you can't bear it any longer. :heart:

You're welcome! And thanks for not forgetting. I'm mostly ok. I can hang in there until you find someone else.

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you - I'm working on it!!

[blueeyedguys]

Updated with 15 new sways since last update

[atomic sagebrush]

Thank you so much!!

[Nemcemger76]

Unfortunately none of these links work- when I copy and paste them in the browser it gives an error message

[Nemcemger76]

Thought multivitamins swayed blue? And also for the teas how could total sways be 50+ but the success rate is 70+?

[atomic sagebrush]

Thought multivitamins swayed blue? And also for the teas how could total sways be 50+ but the success rate is 70+?

There is an error in the stats that we have tried to fix and it keeps coming back. Disregard the results for the teas. obviously, a sway tactic could not yield 133% success rate. It is inaccurate and I had put a message to that effect in the stat posts but apparently someone took it out. You should not be using the teas anyway because given your age it would yield very low chance of conception. I repeat, DO NOT USE PEPPERMINT TEA, that number is inaccurate, far more positives than there actually are, and we got absolutely abysmal results for women over 35 using it, they did not conceive while drinking it, and it is extremely disruptive to the menstrual cycle, delaying or even stopping people from ovulating.

Multivitamins SWAY BLUE. We got 80% success rate with using them in blue sways. The best study ever done on maternal preconception diet and gender conceived proved that women who ate more nutrients across the boards had more boys. Just because a handful of people took prenatals and still got girls while taking it, usually they were people who had been trying a long time and had been on diet a long time (which is why they were taking them). Less fertile people who have been on diet a long time have more girls, but this does not mean that they therefor sway pink. We include that number to show that if a person needs to take them, you can still get girls, but it is not a recommended pink sway tactic and almost certainly never will be.

[atomic sagebrush]

Unfortunately none of these links work- when I copy and paste them in the browser it gives an error message

What links? The link to add your sway works for me and I'm not sure what other links you're talking about.

[Nemcemger76]

There is an error in the stats that we have tried to fix and it keeps coming back. Disregard the results for the teas. obviously, a sway tactic could not yield 133% success rate. It is inaccurate and I had put a message to that effect in the stat posts but apparently someone took it out. You should not be using the teas anyway because given your age it would yield very low chance of conception. I repeat, DO NOT USE PEPPERMINT TEA, that number is inaccurate, far more positives than there actually are, and we got absolutely abysmal results for women over 35 using it, they did not conceive while drinking it, and it is extremely disruptive to the menstrual cycle, delaying or even stopping people from ovulating.

Multivitamins SWAY BLUE. We got 80% success rate with using them in blue sways. The best study ever done on maternal preconception diet and gender conceived proved that women who ate more nutrients across the boards had more boys. Just because a handful of people took prenatals and still got girls while taking it, usually they were people who had been trying a long time and had been on diet a long time (which is why they were taking them). Less fertile people who have been on diet a long time have more girls, but this does not mean that they therefor sway pink. We include that number to show that if a person needs to take them, you can still get girls, but it is not a recommended pink sway tactic and almost certainly never will be.

I just saw this and thank you for your reply. Given the current situation, I am worried about getting sick, take the vitamins for my immune system. do you recommend elderberry? That’s something else We take for our immune system. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Nemcemger76]

What links? The link to add your sway works for me and I'm not sure what other links you're talking about.

I actually got them to work - I was looking at a wrong link, I think. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[atomic sagebrush]

I just saw this and thank you for your reply. Given the current situation, I am worried about getting sick, take the vitamins for my immune system. do you recommend elderberry? That’s something else We take for our immune system. Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The only supplements I recommend for pink sways are folic acid or folate, and fiber. I understand wanting to take them given the circumstances but I can't sign off on them for pink sways.

[Abifasc]

Atomic, do you have stats on myoinositol?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[atomic sagebrush]

Yes it's under "Pregnitude" which is the brand name many people use. It's at a stunning 94% right now although I think that's unnaturally high and is likely a quirk of statistics.

[atomic sagebrush]

^^ quirk of statistics meaning one or two lucky sways has pushed up the results higher than it really is, and as more people use it we will likely see that number drop

[Abifasc]

Thank you! That helps!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk