PDA

View Full Version : Ramzi Atomic Sagebrush?? Anyone else?



Mickey2014
July 10th, 2016, 04:09 AM
So I'm actually team green. Almost 30 weeks pg and too scared to find out gender for sure. Here are some early u/s pics. Think I'm screwed right? According to ramzi this would be another boy right? [emoji20]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160710/88c529bdddf649417cdc27110eee065b.jpg first transvaginal 6 weeks

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160710/6985b50c98fe80e5cb6e186c4ed24a73.jpg

Second abdominal 6,5 weeks

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160710/df620d52ab677143ce878f7134941fa8.jpg

Third transvaginal 7 weeks


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

Mickey2014
July 10th, 2016, 04:11 AM
Some morehttp://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160710/1ceafec93aa9e865840a629121b09109.jpg
Transvaginal 8+4

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160710/49db192919257193ab359ee3c566608a.jpg

Last. Abdominal 9 weeks


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

Mickey2014
July 10th, 2016, 06:51 AM
Anyone??

familymatters
July 10th, 2016, 07:55 AM
I don't know anything about the ramzi theory but do you have any nub images from your 12 week scan?

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

Mickey2014
July 10th, 2016, 08:16 AM
No I don't. Nub wasn't captured well enough.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

atomic sagebrush
July 10th, 2016, 03:04 PM
I don't believe in Ramzi after seeing several people send $10 to Dr. Ramzi himself to guess on their ultrasounds and he guessed wrong.

Mickey2014
July 10th, 2016, 05:12 PM
Yeah i know it's not 100% accurate but on another forum ramzi for girls seems to be on the other side all te time so that's why I'm losing hope [emoji53]


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

atomic sagebrush
July 10th, 2016, 05:22 PM
Well, if it's on the other side in some places and Dr. Ramzi says something the opposite, that's a pretty good sign it probably doesn't work too reliably. :)

Mickey2014
July 11th, 2016, 01:50 AM
Unfortunately most of them turned out correct [emoji37]


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

atomic sagebrush
July 12th, 2016, 03:49 PM
So they say. How could Ramzi publish a study that says 90-whatever percent and then everything on the other site be the opposite?? See how that indicates that it isn't really reliable?? It just doesn't make sense, they can't both be true, you know??

Mickey2014
July 13th, 2016, 02:56 AM
I don't think on that other forum (sorry i said site, it is a forum) it's on the opposite side then ramzi says. Oh well it's still confusing to me and probably always will be. And on my own photos i can't even make out the placenta clear enough.


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

atomic sagebrush
July 14th, 2016, 12:10 PM
It doesn't matter where it was, my point is, if Ramzi says one thing, and then any other source seems to be getting good results with something else, then the whole thing is suspect. Site, forum, whatever, it doesn't matter, something isn't adding up. I hate to see you guys upset over something that is not reliable. :)

Mickey2014
July 14th, 2016, 01:05 PM
Thanks! I understand what you mean now [emoji4]


Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk