PDA

View Full Version : The TROUBLE with timing!



atomic sagebrush
January 14th, 2012, 01:52 PM
Updated 12-12-17

Ah, timing. The glorious promise that, if only we have sex on the magical day, we will then conceive a baby of our desired gender. It sounds SO great, so easy. You can read about it a thousand places online and surely that many people can‘t be wrong…can they?

It even makes sense - X is big and slow, Y is small and fast, X must swim slow but live a long time, Y must be quick but die sooner. Of course! It explains EVERYTHING!

The trouble with timing is, IT DOESN’T WORK! Here’s why.

--Timing is based entirely on one man’s mistake.

50-odd years ago, Dr. Landrum Shettles (who was actually an incredibly smart man in pretty much every way and did wonders for the cause of infertility), took a look at some sperm under a microscope and noticed something that no one had ever seen before. Some of the sperm had tiny little heads and seemed to be moving faster, while other sperm had big fat heads and were moving more slowly. He immediately concluded that the fat heads HAD to be X sperm and the skinny heads HAD to be Y sperm. He began to perform and publish studies based on this idea, write books, and we STILL can’t get rid of the guy 50 years later.

The problem is, he was TOTALLY WRONG. What he was really looking at, was capacitated and uncapacitated sperm. The capacitation process had not yet been discovered when Dr. Shettles developed his timing theory. Capacitated sperm are sperm that have lost the protective cap at their tip and are all excited about it because it means they’re ready to fertilize an egg. They move fast and Dr. Shettles wrongfully thought they were Y sperm.
Uncapacitated sperm are bigger and more laid back because they still have their protective cap and Dr. Shettles wrongfully thought they were X sperm.

Eventually, the uncapacitated sperm lose that cap and they will be small and move around a lot more too, but they are BOTH X and Y sperm, whether they have a cap or whether they don’t. Sperm capacitate in waves and they seem to be able to communicate with each other on some primitive level to coordinate this process, so as long as there are living sperm present, some will be capacitated and ready to fertilize any cute little egg who happens to show up dateless at the party, and some will be waiting their turn.

Over the course of time, the capacitated sperm will die - capacitated sperm don’t live too long after they lose their cap. So when Dr. Shettles makes the claim that “Y sperm don’t live as long“, what he was really observing was the early deaths of capacitated sperm. Capacitated sperm DO die sooner than uncapacitated sperm, but X and Y sperm live the same length of time! It is VERY likely that there always going to be SOME X and SOME Y among the capacitated and incapacitated sperm (although we do not know this for a fact and this ~may~ be something that does sway gender.)

It is totally and completely impossible for anyone to look through a microscope and tell the difference between X and Y sperm. If they could, we would have no need for Microsort and PGD. Dr. Potter or Dr. Sher or Dr. Braverman or any RE could simply, at a glance, pick out X and Y sperm (and they would LOVE to be able to do this because it would make high tech gender swaying much more affordable and bring them tons of new business!!) But they cannot tell the difference between X and Y sperm by looking at them through a microscope. It is impossible to do, which is why they use Microsort and PGD!!! So whenever you read anything about timing that claims that X sperm are big and slow and live a long time, Y sperm are small and fast and die quickly, it is ALL nonsense BS based on Dr. Shettles’ BIG mistake.

Interestingly, Dr. Shettles did manage to come up with a couple things that really DO sway gender - abstinence + one attempt really DOES sway pink and releasing every 2-4 days really DOES sway blue, so it is very likely that his method was as succesful as it was because of this serendipitous suggestion. Sometimes, it is better to be lucky than good.

--It's a fact! X and Y sperm live the same length of time, swim the same speed, and are really pretty similar in size.

Seriously, for reals. The ONLY difference between X and Y sperm is the tiny little arm of the X chromosome which amounts to only 1% difference in amount of DNA. There are 22 other chromosomes in each sperm that are all pretty close to the exact same size - the arm of the X amounts to only シ of one chromosome!! If you don‘t believe it, read this http://genderdreaming.com/forum/science-behind-gender-swaying/1562-what-real-differences-between-x-sperm-y-sperm.html

On some other sway sites, they make a claim that timing works not because of any size difference or life span (since they too know it's been debunked!) but because X and Y sperm swim differently and many women claim to have seen this in a microscope. This idea is based on one study that was done in bull sperm, not human, and in vitro conditions that we have no way of knowing if they even translate into the body, and if so, how. Numbers of sperm in the sample seemed to have way more to do with how the sperm swam than any difference between X and Y sperm. The sperm were also sorted by Microsort before being studied and we have no way to know how much the Microsort procedure affected the sperm. Comparative motility of X and Y chromosome–bearing bovine sperm separated on the basis of DNA content by flow sorting - Penfold - 1998 - Molecular Reproduction and Development - Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199807)50:3%3C323::AID-MRD8%3E3.0.CO;2-L/abstract)

Not only that, but sperm by and large do NOT swim to the egg. They are mostly carried to the egg by currents of EWCM, muscle contractions, and the action of cilia lining the Fallopian tubes, and only need their swimming ability to make it into the cervical crypts and in a few areas like the junction between the uterus and Fallopian tubes. In fact, the fastest swimming sperm are often dead on arrival and incapable of fertilizing the egg.

This study is nearly 20 years old and if there was anything useful in it, researchers would very likely have followed up on it by now (not even the researchers themselves seem to have followed up on this study??) Trained lab technicians with many years of experience cannot tell the difference between X and Y sperm (which is why they use Microsort). It is highly implausible that untrained laymen peering through toy microscopes, especially ones who desperately want to see a particular result to "prove" that their sways are working, are able to see anything that highly trained experts in the field, are not.

--It doesn’t fit in with the biology and workings of the human body.

The entire female reproductive tract is designed to keep sperm alive inside of itself for as long as possible. It has lots of nooks and crannies for sperm to hide in, and all these little hiding places churn out tons of alkaline CM for several days before an egg even arrives. In this environment, sperm can live for 7 days and maybe even 10! The egg only lives for a maximum 24 hours after ovulation, and in many cases, more like 12 hours (and the egg deteriorates for some time before dying and may not be receptive to sperm). Given this design, it is likely that most of the people ever born on the planet were from sperm that was in the reproductive tract BEFORE the egg arrived. If humans could only get pg from BD right at ovulation, the reproductive tract would just be a straight tube with no nooks and crannies for sperm to get lost in, and the egg would come out very close to the vaginal opening.

If you could only or even just mostly conceive a boy from one BD right at ovulation, but conceived mostly girls the other days of the fertile window, the world would be disproportionately female-heavy, but instead, it’s actually the other way around, with 140-160 boys conceived for every 100 females, dropping to 106 boys born for every 100 girls.

Maybe people just DO IT more on O day trying to get pregnant, so that means more boys are conceived that day than all the other days put together ? Maybe not. Humans, unlike all other animals on the planet, have a little quirk called hidden ovulation. We don’t come into visible heat like animals do and we can have intercourse at any time. Because of this, people could not even PREDICT ovulation until very recently, so pregnancies occurred from BD on totally random days during a 5-7 day window when females are fertile enough to keep sperm alive until the egg arrives, rather than from a concerted effort at pregnancy on O day. Just from sheer statistics, even if double the amount of conceptions happen from BD on O day, that would leave all the other days of the fertile window for sex to take place on. That would still mean way more girls than boys conceived, if timing swayed in any way at all.

--But there are STUDIES!

Some studies seem to show that timing sways. However, there are also studies that show that DTD with a long cutoff makes more boys than girls. Other studies find more girls on O day. It is extremely likely that the reason why these studies do not agree, is because there is NO pattern there to find. Take 50 people and give them quarters to flip, and repeat this process several other times, and you will have MANY times when there are more heads than tails or vice versa! If there really WAS anything whatsoever to timing, these studies would all be in agreement. Timing is the most studied aspect of gender swaying by far and if there was anything to it, it would have been proved beyond a shadow of a doubt by now.

Beyond sheer luck, several of the studies that claim to support timing, used different protocols for couples who wanted boys and girls. For boys, the couples naturally ovulated and then had IUI done on O day (I assume to ensure that fertilization on O day really occurred.) For girls, the couples were given Clomid and told to have intercourse 2-4 days before ovulation. The problem with this is that IUI sways blue by bypassing the entire female reproductive tract (and sperm are washed and capacitated in advance, possibly removing some chemicals that may sway, and also recall that the capacitation process and primitive communication between sperm may sway in some way as well). Clomid sways pink by creating hostile cervical mucus that then sperm would have to live in for 2-4 days before the egg arrived!! You are supposed to CONTROL variables in studies, not introduce new ones!! The methodology used by the people who did these studies, is akin to telling people, ok Group A, you wear a blue hat and eat a lot of fatty foods and sugar, and Group B, you wear a pink hat and eat only vegetables and whole grains, and then concluding that blue hats clearly make you have heart attacks while pink hats are preventative.

Some of the other studies did not accurately pinpoint O (and even took place before it was really understood HOW to pinpoint O!!) or relied on self-reported information and these studies are TOTALLY useless. You cannot tell people (especially people who desperately WANT to achieve a certain result, like people with gender disappointment) that they need to do something that may be difficult to do (like abstaining for 14 days or temping every day) as part of a study, and then rely on the info that they then provide to be in any way accurate. Some people keep secrets from the researcher if they think the researcher will be “mad” at them, and others really legitimately want something so much that they may remember things wrong, so they may subconsciously decide they Oed a day later or earlier than they really did. If they forgot to temp one day, they may fill it in anyway in the pattern that they think it “should“ have been, if they DTD on the wrong day they may fudge that info or simply erase it from memory. Even researchers themselves have not been above altering and misrepresenting information.

Spending a day or two on the gender swaying forums will clearly demonstrate that even with a pretty high level of technology and understanding (BBT, OPK, and the ability to track our temps online), it is REALLY tough to pinpoint O even for those of us who are pretty knowledgeable about it. Most of these studies were done with antiquated technology that are not reliable predictors of ovulation anyway. Some even just had women BD on CD 14 for boys and we all know that is totally unreliable because we can O on many different days.

The best studies we have at our disposal do not find any correlation between day of intercourse and gender of baby conceived. I have studies that prove this and many of us have read them. I have deleted the links from this essay because they keep breaking, but it is proven to my satisfaction that all studies using modern technology and knowhow have proved that timing does not sway one iota.

--But I KNOW some people who swear timing worked for them.

Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that these people really did get the timing exactly spot on (which they probably didn’t). Timing has supposedly seemed to sway for some people; whether that was because of luck or because abstinence and missionary with no female O and one attempt sways pink and BD every two days, doggy style with female O seems to sway blue, who knows. IF timing sways, it has to be for some REASON and not a magical, mystical, quality of a certain day.

Maybe it’s dryer CM, maybe it’s sperm count, or many other things - because remember, it can't be that X sperm are big and slow and live a long time, that was Dr. Shettle's BIG mistake. Perhaps instead, it’s that the majority of women have hostile CM on certain cycle days and that sways pink, or that the majority of women who BD on O have more EWCM and that EWCM sways blue. Isn’t it smarter to focus on actually doing the things that really sway, instead of expending this massive effort trying to do timing? Because, if you’re not one of the people in that majority, if you have copious amounts of EWCM 3 DBO, and you rely solely on timing, it won’t work! If you have girls because you have low pH, dry, hostile mucus, you could BD on O day from now until menopause and get girls.

You cannot use your past cycles to predict what your future cycles will be anyway! So even if you really believe with all your heart and soul that timing will sway for you on the basis of all your previous cycles, start taking saw palmetto or L-arginine or B6 and watch your cycle change before your very eyes.

Not only that, but all the people who swear timing worked - we have no way of knowing what else they had going on in their lifestyles or bodies that may have swayed for them. The woman who told me about timing and swore by it, was diagnosed with thyroid cancer right after her daughter was born (she thankfully recovered). Seems very likely to me that the early stages of cancer probably sways a lot harder than DTD on any particular day ever could.

Point being, we cannot know how accurately people even DID timing, if it does work for some people it may not work for you, and it may only seem to work because the people who tried it, have other issues going on that swayed for them. Plus, we can accomplish all the exact same things that timing MIGHT do, in other, better, more reliable ways.

--It's a fact - timing actually really DOESN’T make any sense at all. WHY would timing even sway??

Seriously. Think about it for a minute. I suppose Dr. Shettles chalked this up to just an accident of big and small sperm, but Dr. Shettles was wrong. Scientists now believe that the reason why gender swaying is possible is because it gives a small advantage to whatever gender offspring has the best odds of survival, a pretty awesome thing either designed into us by God or else fashioned over millions of years of natural selection. Why in the ever lovin' HECK would the day of the week you have sex matter in any way whatsoever to the survival odds of your child? Boys need more calories and nutrients of all sorts from the moment of conception thru adulthood. If your body didn’t have enough calories to grow a healthy baby boy on Thursday, does it make any logical sense whatsoever that by having sex Saturday instead, he would be any better off?

Conception, pregnancy, birth, and breastfeeding are VERY dangerous, risky, “biologically expensive” undertakings for the female of any species. It was not at all uncommon for women to die in childbirth even as little as 100 years ago and it was just as risky regardless of whether you delivered a big, healthy baby or one that didn‘t have such a good chance at survival (infant mortality used to be unbelievably high - more than half of all babies born, died before they turned one). Our genes did not survive for countless generations by taking such a major risk to our lives based on something as arbitrary as the day of the week you had sex on.

Virtually everything our bodies do, is for the reason of keeping us alive and helping us pass down our genes to future generations, and keeping that fact in mind, timing makes NO SENSE because it could actually KILL you to conceive a baby with no shot of survival - a huge risk for no benefit! ANY baby could kill you as little as a century ago and so your body didn't want to take that risk for a child with less than the best shot at survival. Even your living children would be more likely to die without a mother to care for them - that is a genetic dead end!! It makes much more sense that our genes would “want” to sway gender not out of sheer luck, but because of real tangible things that would help your them best survive to get handed down to future generations.

--But it can’t hurt, right??

People figure, well, ok, so timing may not work and may be just a bunch of hoo-hah but still, I want to include everything in my sway and timing can’t hurt so I want to do it anyway.

But actually, it really DOES hurt sways all the time!!

:xy:For blue swayers: The entire idea of swaying blue is based around the idea that you’re boosting fertility. With that in mind, blue swayers, by all rights ought to be getting pg more quickly than they have in the past (and certainly quicker than pink swayers!) But something is going seriously wrong because blue swayers are going for months and months without conceiving. The insistence on boy timing is one of those things. Studies have indicated that for best results getting pregnant, it’s better to have intercourse 1-2 days BEFORE ovulation, not rely on one attempt on O day. The sperm may take some time to get where it needs to go and capacitate in enough numbers to find that eggo before it deteriorates and can no longer be fertilized.

The longer you go on not getting pregnant, the longer you have to stay on diets/and supps that are really not great for you. I personally do not think that eating ghastly levels of sodium, drinking baking soda water, and eliminating calcium entirely from your diet, is in any way good for you, your fertility, and may even reduce your odds of conceiving a son over the course of many months. Additionally, many women end up gaining too much weight on IG or HE Diets by staying on them for several months. Gaining a little weight will help your blue sway, but gaining too much weight may actually backfire and sway pink, if you gain so much that you actually suppress your fertility.

Also, if the “high sperm numbers sway blue” theory is true, you are putting yourself at a major disadvantage with only one attempt at O. If you had two or even three attempts in your fertile window, when you have optimized your environment for best sperm survival thru diet and supps, you would be sure to increase numbers of available sperm in your reproductive tract. Do not worry about swaying pink by having more than one attempt! For frequent release to sway pink, it has to be 7-10 days in a row without skipping any days. DTD 2 days in a row WILL NOT SWAY PINK.

:XX:For pink swayers: The stress and level of attention to detail involved in timing methods is among the worst things you can do for your testosterone levels. You have to undertake this huge project, take your temp, track it on paper, obsess over every little nuance of it, and for what? Something that does not even sway for you at all!!!

In addition, by doing these long cutoffs (some people do 4 and 5 day cutoffs - you can get pg that way when you are very fertile, but when you’re doing things to sway pink, your environment will be a lot more hostile to sperm and they will have a much harder time surviving), you make it very difficult to conceive. The longer you go on not getting pregnant, the longer you have to stay on the diet and supps, and the more stressed out people tend to get. Their testosterone (or whatever it is that is swaying via personality factors, because I am no longer convinced this is testosterone) may go up from stress and then after one or 2 BFN, they start dropping things, and usually they start with diet because it’s the hardest to stick to, and go from there. Diet really sways for real, biological reasons. If nothing else, DO DIET!

Also, I have not really mentioned O+12 in this essay but O+12 makes it next to impossible for many people to get pg. http://genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/35539-no-12-a.html Many eggs (esp. in older women) do not even LIVE 12 hours after ovulation and they are certainly not in the greatest condition at the end of their lifespan. And you may as well take a birth control pill as try for an O+16 or O+20. Anyone who claims they got pg at O+20 either messed up on calculating ovulation or else released two eggs that month and hit the second egg. And the people who do cutoff and O+12 - they almost certainly got pg from the cutoff BD and not the O+12 and that is true regardless of what they say, think or believe. Remember, your entire reproductive tract is designed to conceive using sperm already in your body before ovulation even occurs.

The longer you go on not getting pregnant, the more the diet takes a toll and if you do end up losing too much weight too quickly, you can interfere with your ovulation. It’s much much better to hit it hard on diet for a couple months and get pg fast, than to linger on for ages on the diet while driving yourself insane chasing after sway tactics that don’t even work.

--Yes, but I have to do the opposite!!

No, you DON’T have to do the opposite. If timing doesn’t sway, that’s NOT what got you boys in the first place. I have seen SO MANY people claim they conceived on “boy timing” only to find out that they BD every two days (which is boy frequency and they prob. had more than one attempt in their fertile window anyway, and who knows which BD was even the one that yielded the baby) or “girl timing” only to find out that they did abstain + one attempt (which sways pink!). It is the frequency and number of attempts that is swaying, not the day you DTD on. Not only that, but really, unless you had an ultrasound at the moment your egg released, or a trigger shot to make you release an egg, you really DO NOT know when exactly you Oed. You may have Oed early, late, released two eggs and hit only one, etc. You CANNOT pinpoint the moment of ovulation based on O pains, OPK, temps, cervical texture, CM, or anything else.

Plus, people always disregard all the other things they had going on that were boy friendly and focus solely on timing. I know that with my DS 1 and 3 in particular, I may as well have been DOING a boy sway for them because my diet was so boy friendly it was ridiculous! That I conceived both of them from BD before ovulation, sure didn’t make them girls!

Look at it this way - if you don’t lose weight on the Atkins diet, there is usually a REASON for that. Maybe your thyroid is screwed up, maybe you have lousy metabolism from years of crash dieting, maybe you ate too many calories overall, maybe you needed to exercise more, maybe you didn’t really understand the Atkins diet and ate too many vegetables when you weren’t supposed to, or whatever. Maybe you even cheated on the Atkins diet and are conveniently forgetting those times. It wasn’t because the Atkins diet “doesn’t work” for you and you have to do the opposite and so therefore you need to start eating nothing but birthday cake at every meal. That won’t work either and will just make things worse! You cannot just treat the symptoms if the disease is still running rampant (not that having sons/daughters is a disease!!) and you for sure can’t just put a pretty bandage on your flesh-eating strep infection! Even if it makes you feel good inside, like you’re “doing something”, a pretty bandage does not cure anything, and timing doesn’t sway. You have to treat what is really swaying for you, or your sway won't work.


I know sometimes when I go around debunking these things people get frustrated. You guys want to know what actually sways, if all this stuff doesn’t. But we don’t have the ability to figure that out. To really unravel the mysteries of gender ratio we have to rely scientists and researchers to put it all together. In the meantime, we can use logic and reason and the science that already exists, to rule out the things that are simply not adding up!

zanacal
January 14th, 2012, 02:32 PM
Wonderful! Incredibly useful as everybody has so many questions and concerns about timing - I'm going to sticky it for that reason. Thanks Atomic x

Hobbermittens
January 14th, 2012, 02:38 PM
Thanks for putting up this essay!! It was exactly what I needed to read today. I have been stewing about my attempt and my possible early ovulation, because if I did indeed O when FF says, I had an attempt the day before and the day after, and I have been stressing that I missed the "blue" window. For getting pregnant quick purposes, we did 4 attempts this cycle, though 2 may have been too late.

I got my daughters from one BD each-- DD1 was a 4 day accidental cut-off (I was charting to prevent pregnancy and screwed it up), and DD2 was on O day. So DD1's conception agrees with Shettles, though clearly DD2 does NOT! DS was a product of 5 or 6 days in a row of BD during my fertile time. So I can see, with just my experience, that timing isn't a huge factor!

rainbowflower
January 14th, 2012, 03:09 PM
A much needed topic!

Perhaps you can add in an explanation as to why Shettles' own study seemed to prove his theory (for pink he also asked the women in his sample to do abstaining, no big o, etc)?

Also add in the statistics from healthy non-swayers for conception chances on ov day (30%) compared to those who had a 3+ day cut off (10%) each cycle, so these are likely to be even lower for pink-swayers.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk

Cinss
January 14th, 2012, 06:45 PM
I can't agree more, in my mind there is always going to be 50/50 X and Y spermies racing for the egg at the time of insemination and it is the other sway factors that will eliminate or aid one kind over the other on their journey to the egg.

I have finally decided to DTD evey second day for the whole month instead of aiming for 0-2 + O, it is too frustrating trying to predict O day. And even though i concieved my DD by DTD every second day for the whole month, i am swaying boy with diet, supps and ions, and i really feel if i am going to fall pregnant, this timing method will be the way for me.

Brat23
January 18th, 2012, 06:15 PM
I wish I would have read this during my super sway I was so stressed out it was ridiculous

zanacal
January 19th, 2012, 05:10 AM
I wish I would have read this during my super sway I was so stressed out it was ridiculous

{hugs}, so easily done. We all need a little Atomic sat on our shoulder!!

auroara78
January 19th, 2012, 09:41 AM
I really do believe stress does raise T levels, which can sway boy. I also believe timing is only important in regards to natural vaginal environment, but I do think it sways in any *real* way.

Great essay, thanks as always for your wisdom and knowledge, AS!

Brat23
January 19th, 2012, 07:50 PM
{hugs}, so easily done. We all need a little Atomic sat on our shoulder!!
LOL so true and TY! Congrats on your princess I hope to follow in your foot steps!

You wanna know the funny thing (And no offense please when I say this) I started reading Atomics blogs and stuff over on IG and was extremely interested b/c of all of the conflicting theories etc.... I started to feel torn should I listen to her or not? But then I thought well she does have 4 boys.... And some of the info I felt like not that she was limited in her research but it almost felt like she was made to" be" limiting (if that makes sense) I thought maybe I was getting the whole story.

I started tons of threads over there asking questions I had concerns about or things that just didnt make sense to me and pretty much I got one line answers unless a regular chimed in. I was ALWAYS confused.

Now that my sway resulted in an opposite I find myself questioning the very same methods I originally questioned. DH and I discussed PGD and right now it is out of reach so swaying went back on the table. I swore that if I swayed again it would be completely different and I would research and research until I found the answers I needed.

FF I come here and see all of Atomics research, explanations, theories and personal opinions and I feel like a whole new door has been opened to me. So many of my previous questions have already been answered without needing to make 10 posts. I am so very grateful that Atomic has donated her time and shared this all with us. I could not have been more wrong.

Like the saying trust your gut!

atomic sagebrush
January 20th, 2012, 10:15 AM
Brat did you read this yet? This is how I came to be here and how and why I think differently than the IG gals do. http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-discussion/7507-ig-vs-gd-swaying-whats-difference-who-atomic-sagebrush-anyway.html Most people don't realize I didn't sway with my first 3 boys, only my last one, so it's not like I have this big string of tiny blue failures - my oldest son is 20 years old and the Internet wasn't even INVENTED when he was born!!! ;)

Honestly, you're right because I was not being censored exactly but I was censoring myself over there. I would have had to launch into World War Three every day to fully express my thinking on things and I didn't have the time or energy (online debating is pretty upsetting!!) Plus, Tamara is my friend and the more "trouble" I stirred up, it was like I was just making tons of problems for her to have to deal with, you know??

Plus, when I was on IG I hadn't even done a quarter of all the research that I have since then so I really didn't have everything as fully fleshed out as it is now. I knew stuff about the IG sway didn't add up, but I didn't have all the evidence about it that I do now.

atomic sagebrush
January 20th, 2012, 11:42 AM
A much needed topic!

Perhaps you can add in an explanation as to why Shettles' own study seemed to prove his theory (for pink he also asked the women in his sample to do abstaining, no big o, etc)?

Also add in the statistics from healthy non-swayers for conception chances on ov day (30%) compared to those who had a 3+ day cut off (10%) each cycle, so these are likely to be even lower for pink-swayers.

Sent from my HTC Wildfire using Tapatalk

Better???

Brat23
January 20th, 2012, 05:01 PM
Atomic no I haven't read it but I most certainly will. IM still making my way through over here. From the little that I have read so far alot of it makes sense. Like I said in my pp I have already found a TON of answers simply from your thorough research (AMAZING) I am so happy to hear the "WHOLE STORY" for once. IG was definitely getting a little crazy and more then half the time my posts got lost in the mix. This time I am going to relax and let it all flow together.

I am thankful for all of your hardwork and I appreciate your efforts!

atomic sagebrush
January 21st, 2012, 11:43 AM
It is a LOT to get through I understand! My thinking has been that it's better to have things explained too much, than not enough! :) I know it seems overwhelming at first though.

amberdawnsgeese
January 24th, 2012, 11:45 PM
I am sooooo lost. :think: We haven't started TTC yet (waiting for AF to come) but I've been planning all along completely wrong apparently. I don't know what to think anymore..........

rainbowflower
January 25th, 2012, 05:45 AM
I am sooooo lost. :think: We haven't started TTC yet (waiting for AF to come) but I've been planning all along completely wrong apparently. I don't know what to think anymore..........

:( it is a minefield... I think a lot of works for one person doesn't work for another. It's about finding the sway aspects that work for YOU and your family. Diet seems to be the most important aspect, followed by lower sperm count (and there are a variety of ways of achieving that such as frequent release/abstaining, jump+dump, douching, etc.).

skrimpy
January 25th, 2012, 07:35 AM
AS can you link to a paper/research site that talks about size differences being related to capacitation? I've found info on how it influences their movement patterns but I'm not finding anything concrete on size. I must be putting the wrong searches into Google :p

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 07:42 AM
Amberdawn - I know it's confusing at first, but better to have the real info and then decide what you want to do with it, than to proceed based on bad info and end up with an opposite. Good luck.

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 07:56 AM
Skrimpy, I'm not sure what you're talking about. That Dr. Shettles was wrong about X and Y sperm being capacitated vs. uncapacitated, is now common knowledge that I have read about a bazillion diff. places. Kinda like asking for a study that proves germs cause disease. There is one study that is often cited Gledhill 1988 but I can't find it online and never have been able to.

The path of the sperm cells to the oocyte - capacitation (http://www.embryology.ch/anglais/dbefruchtung/weg03.html) (this link explains that capacitated sperm have lost their cap and become hyperactive, which is why Shettles thought y sperm were super fast) Fertilization (http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/fert/fert.html) (this link shows the size diff. between capacitated and uncapacitated sperm and is just a nice explanation of the process) Entrenched misinformation about X and Y sperm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1440662/) here is a letter from Valerie Grant with a better explanation than I am capable of.

Sorry that's really all I have time for.

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 08:05 AM
Skrimpy, I'm not sure what you're talking about. That Dr. Shettles was wrong about X and Y sperm being capacitated vs. uncapacitated, is now common knowledge that I have read about a bazillion diff. places. Kinda like asking for a study that proves germs cause disease. There is one study that is often cited Gledhill 1988 but I can't find it online and never have been able to.

The path of the sperm cells to the oocyte - capacitation (http://www.embryology.ch/anglais/dbefruchtung/weg03.html) (this link explains that capacitated sperm have lost their cap and become hyperactive, which is why Shettles thought y sperm were super fast) Fertilization (http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/reprod/fert/fert.html) (this link shows the size diff. between capacitated and uncapacitated sperm and is just a nice explanation of the process) Entrenched misinformation about X and Y sperm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1440662/) here is a letter from Valerie Grant with a better explanation than I am capable of.

Sorry that's really all I have time for.

skrimpy
January 26th, 2012, 10:28 AM
Not sure how to rephrase was I was saying to make it clear. I'm not doubting that Dr. Shettles was wrong or that there's no sizing difference. I'm just having trouble finding anything that explains the difference between capacitated sperm and non-capicitated sperm via their relative sizes. I can find documentation on their speed, but I don't see anything on size. The second link you gave looked promising, but the animated gif that shows the sperm losing part of its cap and changing is an explanation of what happens as it's burrowing into the egg, or at least that's what I understood from it.

I guess in the end it doesn't really matter much, but I just like to see documentation and though I've found concrete explanations as to how capacitation influences speed (and the appearance of the sperm "tails") I can't find anything that discusses how it impacts relative size. The sizing change information I've seen seems to come after they are attempting to penetrate the outer shell of the egg, which also seems to be a different process than capacitation.

Like I said, I guess it doesn't matter in the end, don't mean to be a bother.

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 11:06 AM
You're not being a bother, it's just that it's not something that has a "study" because it is simply describing something, KWIM??

I'm not sure that the size difference is that big, not like a great dane vs. a chihuahua or anything, it's that it was enough for Dr. Shettles to notice it through the microscope using whatever method he was using, and that was the entire basis for his theory.

CFTR is essential for sperm fertilizing capacity and is correlated with sperm quality in humans (http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/2/317/F2.expansion) Here is a picture

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 11:08 AM
You're not being a bother, it's just that it's not something that has a "study" because it is simply describing something, KWIM??

I'm not sure that the size difference is that big, not like a great dane vs. a chihuahua or anything, it's that it was enough for Dr. Shettles to notice it through the microscope using whatever method he was using, and that was the entire basis for his theory.

CFTR is essential for sperm fertilizing capacity and is correlated with sperm quality in humans (http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/2/317/F2.expansion) Here is a picture

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 11:09 AM
You're not being a bother, it's just that it's not something that has a "study" because it is simply describing something, KWIM??

I'm not sure that the size difference is that big, not like a great dane vs. a chihuahua or anything, it's that it was enough for Dr. Shettles to notice it through the microscope using whatever method he was using, and that was the entire basis for his theory.

http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/2/317/F2.expansion Here is a picture

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 11:39 AM
found the study - sorry not full text and not terribly helpful but you can plainly see, that if they are coming up with 10 different size parameters for sperm, none of which are gender related, that whatever Dr. Shettles was seeing was NOT gender of sperm but something else entirely.

Quantification and classification of human spe... [Fertil Steril. 1988] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3384107)

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 11:39 AM
found the study - sorry not full text and not terribly helpful but you can plainly see, that if they are coming up with 10 different size parameters for sperm, none of which are gender related, that whatever Dr. Shettles was seeing was NOT gender of sperm but something else entirely.

Quantification and classification of human spe... [Fertil Steril. 1988] - PubMed - NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3384107)

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2012, 05:00 PM
Here is another analysis from IG with a fab picture where you can really see the size difference (thanks Maureen - seriously this time ;))

New research shows that X and Y sperm have the same shape and size - Gender Selection News (http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2006/01/13/5342.aspx)

Dr. Shettles also describes how he looked thru the microscope and saw that "X and Y sperm were different sizes" in his book, in very great detail. We now know this to be impossible (unless Dr. Shettles maybe had some sort of superhuman sperm seeing abilities of which we are unaware) so if not capacitated and uncapacitated sperm, then what was he even seeing?

skrimpy
January 26th, 2012, 08:45 PM
Ah that is a fabulous pic, thanks AS! That's what I wasn't able to find :D LOL chihuahua and great dane :p I figured it wouldn't be too huge of a difference seeing as the little guys aren't that big to begin with, but it was frustrating me that I could find NO pics or anything... I just found pictures of swimmers with straight tails and swimmers with zigzag tails (purported to be the hyper, capicatated boys!)

It's very interesting to see the difference in them, and the Oxford pic that shows all three stages they go through on the way to fertilization attempts.

atomic sagebrush
January 28th, 2012, 12:14 PM
Thanks for asking because it improves the quality of info for everyone!! :)

Flava
January 31st, 2012, 02:43 PM
Brat did you read this yet? This is how I came to be here and how and why I think differently than the IG gals do. http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-discussion/7507-ig-vs-gd-swaying-whats-difference-who-atomic-sagebrush-anyway.html Most people don't realize I didn't sway with my first 3 boys, only my last one, so it's not like I have this big string of tiny blue failures - my oldest son is 20 years old and the Internet wasn't even INVENTED when he was born!!! ;)

Honestly, you're right because I was not being censored exactly but I was censoring myself over there. I would have had to launch into World War Three every day to fully express my thinking on things and I didn't have the time or energy (online debating is pretty upsetting!!) Plus, Tamara is my friend and the more "trouble" I stirred up, it was like I was just making tons of problems for her to have to deal with, you know??

Plus, when I was on IG I hadn't even done a quarter of all the research that I have since then so I really didn't have everything as fully fleshed out as it is now. I knew stuff about the IG sway didn't add up, but I didn't have all the evidence about it that I do now.

I just read this..well I wish you spoke what was on your mind back on IG lol maybe I would got my boy then :-( oh well :-)

atomic sagebrush
February 1st, 2012, 11:54 AM
Flava, I did but got buried usually.

Flava
February 1st, 2012, 02:02 PM
Flava, I did but got buried usually.

yeah that's sad...no one liked that on IG. Here is different , and everyone want you to post lol .I like it here that is why I still hang out haha!

atomic sagebrush
February 3rd, 2012, 10:00 AM
I know, I LOVE that about this site! I don't feel like it's all HT vs. swayers, girl mom vs. boy mom, o+12'ers vs. cutoff'ers...not to mention circ vs. no-circ, ear piercers vs. non ear piercers, etc. I used to get SOOOO stressed out on IG I couldn't even go on there sometimes.

Butterfly Spirit
February 7th, 2012, 05:48 AM
Did you write this? It's very impressive!!! You should write a book and title The Trouble With Timing! HaHa :rofl:

atomic sagebrush
February 8th, 2012, 09:21 AM
Yes, I write a lot of the essays! :)

zanacal
February 8th, 2012, 12:06 PM
I was thinking this when I spotted the Hazel Chesterman-Philips book under my bed - she made a whole book out of timing and was no expert and you have so much more to say!

Allegra
March 27th, 2012, 02:35 PM
Wow this essay really made me feel better. We ttc girl and got 0+12 wrong and ended up DTD just on Ovulation. I'm crossing my fingers. :)

atomic sagebrush
March 30th, 2012, 12:39 PM
Allegra, I was looking back at my calendar and if what my doctor says is correct, I conceived this little girl a few hours before O - perfect shettles timing for a boy.

Cienna
May 21st, 2012, 12:38 AM
Atomic Sagebrush,
Thanks so much for well researched and written essay. I find this all really interesting. I can only think it is a positive to reduce stress when trying to conceive. I am starting my diet this week. Will be starting to try and concieve in the next 2-3 months, and as I have already got four boys, find that when I think about it all too much the panic does set in. I look forward to finding more of your information, is there anywhere I can find it all in one place?

auroara78
May 21st, 2012, 10:55 AM
I would just like to remind everyone that I have created all 3 of my children by BD'ing on O day!

2 boys and a little girl coming in Sept! I don't think timing sways at all, the only thing about it that may *seem* like it's swaying is EWCM.

My boys were pull out accidents so that means there was even less sperm up there, I was just living a very boy friendly lifestyle!

atomic sagebrush
May 21st, 2012, 12:13 PM
Atomic Sagebrush,
Thanks so much for well researched and written essay. I find this all really interesting. I can only think it is a positive to reduce stress when trying to conceive. I am starting my diet this week. Will be starting to try and concieve in the next 2-3 months, and as I have already got four boys, find that when I think about it all too much the panic does set in. I look forward to finding more of your information, is there anywhere I can find it all in one place?

Hi and welcome, Cienna!

Here are the most commonly used TTC girl threads:

http://genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-conceive-girl/1585-read-me-first-planning-your-pink-sway.html

Here is a link to most of my essays:
http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-discussion/3305-complete-index.html

The LE Diet info is available in the Dream Members section but I'm happy to email anyone a copy of the diet, just PM me your email address. I choose not to post it publicly because a lot of the sway sites have sticky fingers unfortunately.

mariposa
May 29th, 2012, 02:28 PM
Itエs fantastic! thanks a lot!!!

LimeRikki
June 29th, 2012, 12:40 AM
Ohhhhh thank GOODNESS I don't have to stress about pinpointing O, as I am one of those women who really don't have very obvious signs of O' ing. One less thing to stress about while swaying! One up for hopefully lowering T levels!

Mum23boys
July 2nd, 2012, 03:56 PM
It is often the frequency that is swaying, not the day you DTD on. ??????? So for a pink sway so I dtd every day or abstain ?? Im confused - for my 3 boys i think we dtd every 2nd day or less right up to ov

atomic sagebrush
July 3rd, 2012, 12:38 PM
Yes, for a pink sway you would have your husband release every day for 7-10 days before your attempt OR abstain for 7-10 days before an attempt OR have him release 2-3 times a day for 2-3 days before an attempt OR have him release once, throw it away, then have your attempt as soon as he is able to DTD again (within 1-6 hours).

DTD every second day is ideal for a boy.

suregena
July 3rd, 2012, 12:49 PM
What about DTD every second day WHILE DH continues to release on the non-DTD in between days? This thought occurred to me since sperm stays alive for a little bit but would help keep count within low but still decent timing for pregnancy?

I.e. instead of daily bd after fr, after FR for 7-10 days, to DTD one day, he releases the next day, you DTD the third day, etc, until O (if you are BDing through o, anyway)?

atomic sagebrush
July 3rd, 2012, 12:56 PM
What about DTD every second day WHILE DH continues to release on the non-DTD in between days? This thought occurred to me since sperm stays alive for a little bit but would help keep count within low but still decent timing for pregnancy?

I.e. instead of daily bd after fr, after FR for 7-10 days, to DTD one day, he releases the next day, you DTD the third day, etc, until O (if you are BDing through o, anyway)?

Yep, that's fine! I do think it's probably best to give it at least one month doing a strict sway with just one attempt just to see if you can conceive that way (most people won't be able to, esp. if they're doing a lot of other things to sway) before you add in multiple attempts.

suregena
July 3rd, 2012, 04:05 PM
If I can get a positive OPK, I might do just one attempt. If I were, do I jump and dump?

My weight is just sitting and not drastically lower than my conception weight with my son, so trying to not get down about it but have to TTC this month...

girlmom
July 3rd, 2012, 04:36 PM
i don't have alot of faith in timing ladies. all my girls were conceived on o day. finally my little man was conceived either 5 days before o with a 14 day abstance ( we had a new baby in the house and i was breastfeeding and tired) 12 months after our dd6 was born we got ds1! i would pay attention to diet then to stress out about timing.

atomic sagebrush
July 3rd, 2012, 08:30 PM
If I can get a positive OPK, I might do just one attempt. If I were, do I jump and dump?

My weight is just sitting and not drastically lower than my conception weight with my son, so trying to not get down about it but have to TTC this month...

I ~personally~ would not do J and D with one attempt. Give it 5 minutes.

Inky
September 9th, 2012, 09:55 PM
Thank you for this post! It's helpful, and actually encouraging! I HATE the whole timing thing.

Question though:
WHY does frequent release sway girl?
WHY does abstinence sway girl?

I wish I understood the why, so I could feel more confident in these things :)

atomic sagebrush
September 17th, 2012, 01:13 PM
Thank you for this post! It's helpful, and actually encouraging! I HATE the whole timing thing.

Question though:
WHY does frequent release sway girl?
WHY does abstinence sway girl?

I wish I understood the why, so I could feel more confident in these things :)

We actually don't know, but what we do know is that everything that lowers male sperm count (either what DH is shooting, or the survival rates of the swimmers after they're inside the female body) seems to sway pink. FR and abstain both reduce overall numbers of sperm. Fewer sperm seem to sway pink for reasons we do not know.

http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-discussion-ttc-boy-girl-home-swaying-info/10156-jellybean-factory-%96-understanding-sperm-count-frequency.html

xxxx
January 23rd, 2013, 12:53 AM
Thanks As, this is the most fantastic essay I have read on this timing that has become too much of a public subject. Timing has been debunked!. My sis has boys and she never actually knows when they were conceived as she DTD all the way after AF. Nice to know it's been overemphasized for too long.

1adorablebabyboymom
February 10th, 2013, 01:00 PM
I conceived a boy with a few days abstinence the first time, and then just found our second is going to be a boy also. We had about a 6 or more days abstinence (as in no releases of any sort). I def was not on any other 'swaying' factors at all, and had a predominant boy diet looking back. Do you think that is what is the thing, or that abstinence does not work very strongly for pink. . . . Discovered this site after this conception took place, so I am gearing up to plan a relaxed (by the time it is time) girl sway. =)

1adorablebabyboymom
February 10th, 2013, 01:01 PM
cut off 3 days before o with first, and 4 day cut off with this one. But now I see that factor is not relevant! =P

Ciansmummy
February 14th, 2013, 05:07 PM
Gosh, I totally thought timing was a huge thing for getting DG. Another reason I'm so pleased I found the site!

Kelissi
March 14th, 2013, 07:29 PM
This is awesome! I've been so concerned about doing the "right" sway, and since there's so much information out there that is PRO Shettles, I've been so stressed about getting the timing perfectly right. Dieting for a pink sway seems much easier to me and low stress, so I'm all about doing that instead!

Dancin Machine
July 7th, 2013, 09:37 AM
Wow, all such good info and encouragement. I'm TTC pink and was becoming very stressed about trying to get the timing right and now I won't worry as much and focus more on other factors. Thank you for sharing all your thoughts and insight :)

Arimethia
September 5th, 2013, 07:49 PM
This is so interesting! I'm happy to have the weight taken off timing, I definitely feel like that would add WAY more stress. We didn't abstain with either of my two boys and in fact DTD every single day after my +OPK with the second. Should we abstain for a certain amount of time instead this time to sway pink? I've heard of abstaining from AF to O, but hubby is concerned about abstaining for what, in my case, usually amounts to just over two weeks!

atomic sagebrush
September 6th, 2013, 10:53 AM
I conceived a boy with a few days abstinence the first time, and then just found our second is going to be a boy also. We had about a 6 or more days abstinence (as in no releases of any sort). I def was not on any other 'swaying' factors at all, and had a predominant boy diet looking back. Do you think that is what is the thing, or that abstinence does not work very strongly for pink. . . . Discovered this site after this conception took place, so I am gearing up to plan a relaxed (by the time it is time) girl sway. =)

Wow somehow I missed a question in this, I'm sorry!

I believe that diet matters very strongly and frequency (as in abstinence) really isn't that reliable a sway tactic. One attempt does seem to be getting good results though.

atomic sagebrush
September 6th, 2013, 10:56 AM
This is so interesting! I'm happy to have the weight taken off timing, I definitely feel like that would add WAY more stress. We didn't abstain with either of my two boys and in fact DTD every single day after my +OPK with the second. Should we abstain for a certain amount of time instead this time to sway pink? I've heard of abstaining from AF to O, but hubby is concerned about abstaining for what, in my case, usually amounts to just over two weeks!

Look over these, they should answer your q's in mind-numbing detail! ;)

http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/5636-frequency-bd-pink-blue.html

http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/10156-jellybean-factory-%96-understanding-sperm-count-frequency.html

If your husband is much over 35 you probably shouldn't do abstain anyway and no one should be abstaining for more than 2 weeks. I prefer yoiu guys stick with 7-10 days. http://genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-conceive-girl/8801-articles-studies-about-why-abstain-not-good-males-over-35-a.html

Hitmebabyonemoretime
June 28th, 2014, 11:38 PM
Yes, for a pink sway you would have your husband release every day for 7-10 days before your attempt OR abstain for 7-10 days before an attempt OR have him release 2-3 times a day for 2-3 days before an attempt OR have him release once, throw it away, then have your attempt as soon as he is able to DTD again (within 1-6 hours).

DTD every second day is ideal for a boy.

First off - wonderful essay, I'm so happy to be done with timing. I'm immediately less stressed and don't have plans to Ttc doe many months
BUT! In regards to frequency - my hubby is like a compulsive masturbator lol - no point sugar coating it (eeeew, sorry). I'm so sure he releases every day. (Or did at my last conception) -although after asking point blank he says he can't remember (come one buddy, was it ever day or not??? Easy question!) So diet is going to be me, since dh is really skinny and basically is naturally on this diet, I want to make sure I'm asking the right things of him for his part. Should we be dtd (with condom to not mess with ph) for 7-10 days and ask him to release once on his own too for that 7-10? Dh is 40 this year... But acts 19 lol I'm sure he's "up" for it.... Or should we release or dtd 7-10 days and so this compressed action the last 2-3?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

blueeyedguys
June 29th, 2014, 04:40 AM
I think Atomic is suggesting every 4 days now (at least for us older folks), release or bd with a condom, then 1 attempt at positive opk.

I'm sure she'll be along sometime to tell you for sure, though.

atomic sagebrush
June 29th, 2014, 11:45 AM
First off - wonderful essay, I'm so happy to be done with timing. I'm immediately less stressed and don't have plans to Ttc doe many months
BUT! In regards to frequency - my hubby is like a compulsive masturbator lol - no point sugar coating it (eeeew, sorry). I'm so sure he releases every day. (Or did at my last conception) -although after asking point blank he says he can't remember (come one buddy, was it ever day or not??? Easy question!) So diet is going to be me, since dh is really skinny and basically is naturally on this diet, I want to make sure I'm asking the right things of him for his part. Should we be dtd (with condom to not mess with ph) for 7-10 days and ask him to release once on his own too for that 7-10? Dh is 40 this year... But acts 19 lol I'm sure he's "up" for it.... Or should we release or dtd 7-10 days and so this compressed action the last 2-3?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Think of frequency, timing, and number of attempts as three separate things. It's YOUR sway, and you and everyone else should include the things that you believe in that make sense to you. Some people may want to start off doing all of them, others none, and all that is ok.

What I really really want you guys to focus on the most is the one attempt. The frequency stuff was a guess on my part about what swayed. There's nothing magic to it, I made it up out of my butt on the assumption that it was sperm numbers alone that was swaying, but the numbers haven't borne it out. So I just hate to see you or anyone getting hung up on frequency. We tried it, didn't seem to work out, moving on. I have no qualms about people keeping it in the mix, but it has to be dropped if you don't get pg or in your case, if you're in a hurry to conceive, it may make sense to drop it right from the start in favor of keeping the one attempt.

I can't answer your question about the "magic" frequency pattern, because I don't even think frequency works any more (and I've never thought that all the fine tuning and thought that people put into it was ever effective or a good idea). I do NOT favor tacking a CFR onto a daily release though. If you do want to go this route, I'd either go for one a day for 7-10 days plus one attempt, or alternate days 1 release, than 2, for 7-10 days, plus one attempt.

atomic sagebrush
June 29th, 2014, 11:48 AM
I think Atomic is suggesting every 4 days now (at least for us older folks), release or bd with a condom, then 1 attempt at positive opk.

I'm sure she'll be along sometime to tell you for sure, though.

Most people want to give it a try with frequency + one attempt, then hubby relasing on his own every 2-4 days with one attempt, before jumping right to the BD every 4 days. It depends on a lot of different circumstances.

Hitme, if you are very late 30's to 40 yourself then I agree I would look seriously about skipping FR and switching to reg. release instead.

Hitmebabyonemoretime
November 25th, 2014, 03:21 PM
Most people want to give it a try with frequency + one attempt, then hubby relasing on his own every 2-4 days with one attempt, before jumping right to the BD every 4 days. It depends on a lot of different circumstances.

Hitme, if you are very late 30's to 40 yourself then I agree I would look seriously about skipping FR and switching to reg. release instead.

Ya. Personal plan is looking better and better. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm 38. I was on the "let him do what he does" plan with one attempt at O.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CurlyPie
November 25th, 2014, 08:13 PM
Trying to sway pink question-

Is it better for my husband to abstain from releasing for 7-10 days and then for us to attempt one time when I get a positive ovulation test?

30 yrs old, one DS

atomic sagebrush
November 26th, 2014, 12:44 PM
Ya. Personal plan is looking better and better. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm 38. I was on the "let him do what he does" plan with one attempt at O.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think that anyone with a less than cooperative DH, "let him do what he does" and then keeping the one attempt is a-ok.

I am stealing that expression BTW!! :agree:

atomic sagebrush
November 26th, 2014, 12:45 PM
Trying to sway pink question-

Is it better for my husband to abstain from releasing for 7-10 days and then for us to attempt one time when I get a positive ovulation test?

30 yrs old, one DS

Unfortunately my crystal ball is in the shop this week and I can't answer questions about what is "better", I just don't have that level of data.

WHatever else ya do, keep the one attempt as long as you can. Drop everything else first.

CurlyPie
November 27th, 2014, 09:32 PM
Atomic - Should I take any antihistamines or cranberry or both?

atomic sagebrush
November 28th, 2014, 12:59 PM
I answered this in another thread, it is very difficult for me to give individualized advice with little to no info to go off of.

I don't advise cranberry for any woman. IT's not safe and the results have been underwhelming anyway. I used to recommend aspirin but the risks have been shown to be too high to justify the results we were getting.

Antihistamines, also underwhelming results and really cut odds of conception by a lot, and they are not always compatible with people's health issues and medication they are on or if they're breastfeeding. So I can't really say that you should or shouldn't take them. Most people want to give it a try for at least a month or two with them, but you obviously shouldn't if they are not right for you

Princess Mom
December 18th, 2014, 04:23 PM
I am so happy I found this site with all this information you have given to us. I did not know about the frequency vs abstaining, I am so glad I did NOT concieve yet! Because I did not realize this! I'm so glad I know so much now and if I didn't concieve this cycle, and I am ready for my new cycle especially with all the new information I have learned. I am just praying also that it works! Awesome info

agilbert21
June 6th, 2015, 02:30 PM
Way overwhelmed just joining. What I have read so far it's not timing, frequency ect so basically there is no way to sway


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hitmebabyonemoretime
June 6th, 2015, 11:31 PM
Way overwhelmed just joining. What I have read so far it's not timing, frequency ect so basically there is no way to sway


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What makes you say that? It's just the old school theories that are getting tossed out (timing/fr). There is sooo much evidence that maternal condition/diet sways.
There's lots to read on here.
How were you thinking of swaying? What is your motivation for checking in on this site? Dreaming pink or blue?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pbn3
June 7th, 2015, 04:10 AM
Way overwhelmed just joining. What I have read so far it's not timing, frequency ect so basically there is no way to sway


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There is so much info on this site initially its overwhelming and you feel you'll never figure it out. If you really want to attempt a natural sway please perservere and keep reading. I estimate I spent in excess of 10+ hours on internet researching natural gender sway then after finding this site I spent at least that again reading essays, sways of both girl and boy (successful and unsuccessful). It does make sense, maybe walk away for a couple days and come back with a fresh look :). I also ordered a personalised plan with atomic (back in January plan ttc this month) and haven't looked back. She has answered every question no matter how stupid I've thought it was. That was my way of taking out the guesswork. It's up to you what you do and believe I just hope you do more homework before writing this site off. All the best whichever way you go :)

atomic sagebrush
June 7th, 2015, 02:13 PM
Way overwhelmed just joining. What I have read so far it's not timing, frequency ect so basically there is no way to sway


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Changing your diet in certain ways, exercise, some supplements, limiting yourself to one attempt, and having your husband jog or ride a bicycle have been shown to sway. (among many other things)

Would you not prefer to know what actually works instead of doing tons of things that don't??? So many of us on here have 2-3-4 or more opposites doing things the "old" way that we are just trying to figure out a better way for everyone's benefit.

Everyone is always welcome to include whatever sway tactics you would like in your sway. WE are trying to figure out the best ways that are going to get the most people healthy babies the quickest with the least amount of miscarriages, and in order to do that, we have to investigate to know if these things even work at all. Many of them don't.

covered in blue
September 13th, 2015, 07:17 PM
Bump

Boyzmommy
November 29th, 2015, 09:08 AM
Bump


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Throwaway_panther
January 23rd, 2016, 02:10 PM
Ahh, of all of the things, this is the most confusing for me! My estimated conception date is roughly Sept. 17, 2016. We had sex Sept. 5,6, and 9 (all estimated to not be in my fertile window) and incomplete sex Sept. 11 (also not in fertile window, though husband I *think* ejaculated on me? Can't remember).

During my estimated fertile window (based on Ovia fertility app, cervical mucous), we then had sex Sept. 12, 13 and Sept. 17 in missionary positions (and then sex again on Sept. 20).

We're having a girl.

I had thought we might have been doing the deed too often, hence a girl (based on the old Shettles methods)... is it actually that we were not having nearly as much sex as we should have? For a boy, then, is the standard "do the deed every two days starting from first cycle day after period" recommended? Or am I misunderstanding?

atomic sagebrush
January 23rd, 2016, 04:03 PM
Ok, not intending to blah blah blah you to death but again, it's not one thing in isolation that sways. You can't go back and look at this, that, or the other thing and say "ah ha, this is IT" because it's a lot of things working in concert. Now that having been said I agree that you were not DTD enough around ovulation. We find that one attempt is getting us girls (with pink sways, that is) 70-75% of the time, this drops to 60-65%, and all the way down to 40-45% with 3 attempts in the fertile window. This means that people having 3 attempts in their fertile window are getting BOYS nearly 60% of the time even with pink sways. It looks to me like the attempts from the 12th and 13th were too early, leaving you with the one viable attempt on the 17th. Really, I do think that you had some other pink friendly stuff going on in addition to the number of attempts, but it didn't help any, either.

For a boy what is working for us is regular, unprotected sex every 2-4 days and then 3 attempt at or around positive OPK - the method that's been working well for us is the night of positive OPK, again the next morning, and again the following night. (even as many as 5, but you have to be careful that you don't start this too soon in case DH runs out of steam before O)

If you really believe in or want to try timing, then have DH release on his own or with you, with non-spermcide condom or pullout, every 2-4 days, but keep the 3 attempts - night of pos OPK, again the next morning, and again the following night. All these three attempts will still be in a Shettles window for a boy.

Throwaway_panther
January 23rd, 2016, 09:31 PM
Ok, not intending to blah blah blah you to death but again, it's not one thing in isolation that sways. You can't go back and look at this, that, or the other thing and say "ah ha, this is IT" because it's a lot of things working in concert. Now that having been said I agree that you were not DTD enough around ovulation. We find that one attempt is getting us girls (with pink sways, that is) 70-75% of the time, this drops to 60-65%, and all the way down to 40-45% with 3 attempts in the fertile window. This means that people having 3 attempts in their fertile window are getting BOYS nearly 60% of the time even with pink sways. It looks to me like the attempts from the 12th and 13th were too early, leaving you with the one viable attempt on the 17th. Really, I do think that you had some other pink friendly stuff going on in addition to the number of attempts, but it didn't help any, either.

For a boy what is working for us is regular, unprotected sex every 2-4 days and then 3 attempt at or around positive OPK - the method that's been working well for us is the night of positive OPK, again the next morning, and again the following night. (even as many as 5, but you have to be careful that you don't start this too soon in case DH runs out of steam before O)

If you really believe in or want to try timing, then have DH release on his own or with you, with non-spermcide condom or pullout, every 2-4 days, but keep the 3 attempts - night of pos OPK, again the next morning, and again the following night. All these three attempts will still be in a Shettles window for a boy.

Thank you! Even dumber question... should I be keeping this frequency up during the TWW as well? Or is it really only important to start at the beginning of the cycle with AF?

atomic sagebrush
January 26th, 2016, 05:59 PM
Thank you! Even dumber question... should I be keeping this frequency up during the TWW as well? Or is it really only important to start at the beginning of the cycle with AF?

We have some evidence that shows both that regular unprotected sex helps boost fertility, and also may sway blue. :agree: Even in 2WW if you can.

Lissastick
May 9th, 2016, 05:07 AM
So, I have a question...
I know it's been said that no one thing can sway, but, let's just say that my diet is boy friendly, would this frequency here sway boy? Ovulated on the 7th, positive OPK on the 6th, but husband did not ejaculate during sex on the last day that's marked on my calendar there...
I actually want to sway girl but have NO idea what I am doing! Lol!

31155

familymatters
May 9th, 2016, 05:46 AM
It probably would have been best not to have DTD on Wednesday, but if you did in fact O on the 7th then I'd say you did do girl timing as you only had one attempt close to O.

Sent from my SM-N920I using Tapatalk

Throwaway_panther
May 9th, 2016, 07:13 AM
So, I have a question...
I know it's been said that no one thing can sway, but, let's just say that my diet is boy friendly, would this frequency here sway boy? Ovulated on the 7th, positive OPK on the 6th, but husband did not ejaculate during sex on the last day that's marked on my calendar there...
I actually want to sway girl but have NO idea what I am doing! Lol!

31155
That's considered boy frequency, BUT is the frequency I had when conceiving my daughter. However, I had a VERY girl-friendly lifestyle, so clearly that trumped attempts!

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Lissastick
May 9th, 2016, 09:52 PM
Yeah, my lifestyle is not girl friendly, I think. Haven't read all the details, but I think I've been doing the WRONG things, thinking I was swaying girl, and was really swaying boy (calcium supps). Sigh. Oh well! One of my friends said she thinks I may be meant to be a boy mom. I think that might be true...
We shall see! I might not even get pregnant this cycle anyway, though. That would be crazy if it happened the very first try. Even my son took two cycles!

atomic sagebrush
May 10th, 2016, 06:13 PM
You always have a chance of a girl!! Good luck and pink dust - if BFN, please let me know how I can help! :)

The calcium, heck, a lot of people swear by that. It didn't work for me and that's partly why a lot of us are here, is because that old-school stuff didn't work for us. But that doesn't mean it's a surefire thing that it won't work for you. Moving forward I think we can work together here in the forums to get it ironed out, it's actually much easier to sway than it seems like at first blush. :)

Lissastick
May 10th, 2016, 10:28 PM
You always have a chance of a girl!! Good luck and pink dust - if BFN, please let me know how I can help! :)

The calcium, heck, a lot of people swear by that. It didn't work for me and that's partly why a lot of us are here, is because that old-school stuff didn't work for us. But that doesn't mean it's a surefire thing that it won't work for you. Moving forward I think we can work together here in the forums to get it ironed out, it's actually much easier to sway than it seems like at first blush. :)

That is so good to hear! I have a very strong feeling that we didn't make a baby this cycle, so, I am going to need to follow the girl diet, right? I feel like that is going to be HARD! haha
And I have to be following it for a long time? I was kind of hoping to conceive before September because I don't want to be in my 3rd trimester in the summer like I was with my son! LOL! I was really hoping for a February or March baby, but, if I can have a real shot at swaying for pink, I feel like I need to try!

Can someone direct me to the girl friendly lifestyle info?

atomic sagebrush
May 11th, 2016, 02:22 PM
It's really not as hard as all that. I had to cram a lot of largely irrelevant info into the diet because otherwise people would have driven me nutty with questions on this or that, but at the core it's very simple:

1500-1800 cals
40-50 g protein (vegetable proteins are best)
30-60 g fat (vegetable fats are best)

Low carb veg are FREE and unlimted, don't count them for anything (not even cals). Higher carb veg and fruit, count only cals but not protein or fat.
Be sure you're getting at minimum 2500 mg potassium a day for safety and health.

Some people want to try to limit sodium to 700-1000 mg but it's really very difficult and most of us have totally given up on that (and our results have only improved since we did!)

Coffee, alcohol, fiber all seem to sway pink.
Everyone take 1200-1600 mcg folic acid or folate

Cheating now and then is not only allowed but mandatory.

That's it! You don't HAVE to follow any food restrictions or "eat this, not that" kind of thing, just stick in the limits eating foods you like that are available to you. We do get best results with 12 weeks + on diet but anything after 6 weeks is still getting good results. The full LE Diet is here http://genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/16780-low-everything-diet-nutshell-version.html but it's a lot more involved, really it's just what I wrote above.

In my signature below there is a link to our index which has probably more than you ever wanted to know in alphabetical order by topic. :)

atomic sagebrush
June 22nd, 2016, 11:31 AM
bump

atomic sagebrush
December 12th, 2017, 12:40 PM
updated slightly, removed broken links

Prayingpinkgirl
December 12th, 2017, 12:46 PM
I had a quick question. I am pretty regular and will ovulate Friday. My husband has been abstaining for almost 2 weeks. Should we bd tonight and tomorrow or just tomorrow. What do you suggest?I feel like the abstaining is the best thing were doing as far as swaying girl. Along with using rephresh 3 days ago and half today. Was planning on using aci jel before if need be. dh also has been taking cranberry pills drinking crystal light and lic root. And I have been drinking loads od crystal light and taking cranberry pills and folic acid.

atomic sagebrush
December 12th, 2017, 01:51 PM
Just one attempt for pink is best. Here's a really long thread about it! http://genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/9736-how-many-attempts-should-i-do-when-pink-blue.html

So you are trying for a cutoff all the way from Tuedsay to Friday plus all that other stuff?? That is fine if you wish to do it that way, just making sure. Be aware that's not giong to give you a very good chance of conception. Might want to stretch it one more day to Wednesday for 2 day cutoff instead.

Princessclare
January 15th, 2018, 02:48 PM
Coming up next month my time to bd my hubby is 37 so abstain or frequent release??? X

Prayingpinkgirl
January 19th, 2018, 01:15 PM
Hi Atomic, I was reading previous posts from year 2014 and you said abstaining did not sway much. What changed from 2014-2018. Has the percentage gone up since then? I did not have success this time. DH did an 11 day abstain with bd at first sign of +opk. Test is still Negative as of today 9dpo. Is there anything else you would suggest I do. I am 31 and he is 29 so I assume the abstaining is safe for us!

atomic sagebrush
January 20th, 2018, 01:51 PM
Coming up next month my time to bd my hubby is 37 so abstain or frequent release??? X

oh sorry I missed this, FR for men over 35.

atomic sagebrush
January 20th, 2018, 01:52 PM
Hi Atomic, I was reading previous posts from year 2014 and you said abstaining did not sway much. What changed from 2014-2018. Has the percentage gone up since then? I did not have success this time. DH did an 11 day abstain with bd at first sign of +opk. Test is still Negative as of today 9dpo. Is there anything else you would suggest I do. I am 31 and he is 29 so I assume the abstaining is safe for us!

No, it's still disappointingly low. I keep it in the mix because many want to use it but it's among the first things we drop to boost chances of conception.

I"m really not following your question about what changed from 2014-2018?

9 DPO does not mean you're out, you are testing too early.

May want to try abstain again but not so long this time, more like 7 days

Prayingpinkgirl
January 22nd, 2018, 10:41 AM
I assumed abstaining increases your chances for a girl. Is it just diet alone then? I see more comments and positive feedback about abstaining in 2017 than back in 2014....I am just lost now. The past 2 months we have abstained and 1 bd at first + opk with no luck. Is the abstaining portion not getting good results or is it just the 1 attempt that increases the chance of girl....So I should do 1 attempt with dh abstaining just 7 days?? Thank you!

atomic sagebrush
January 24th, 2018, 04:53 PM
We all assumed that LOL but when we tracked our results they were disappointing, plus abstain has caused a LOT of stress/trouble for people and can cut odds of conception significantly.

I don't know where you're seeing any positive comments about abstaining. I let people do it now, I let people do it then, but I don't believe it does anything. Trust me, after 4 years of realizing abstain does nothing, I REALLY know abstain does nothing at this point but some people want to try it so I let them.

One attempt is what works. Abstain may do a tiny wee something (like if we took 100 couples, maybe we'd see a teeny bit more girls conceived with abstain) but it just isn't adding anything, plus it is cutting odds of conception with the one attempt which has been far more reliable for us.

Prayingpinkgirl
January 24th, 2018, 05:01 PM
Thanks Atomic for clearing that up lol....So I started AF today, I will possibly ovulate 2/4/18. I have a 26 day cycle. I will do 1 attempt at +opk...what should DH do? Should he release every day, every other day etc. before that 1 attempt or be abstinent for just 7 days. I understand the 1 attempt portion. I just confused as to what DH should be doing?....THANK YOU

atomic sagebrush
January 24th, 2018, 08:27 PM
It's up to you. Both abstain and daily release (every day for 7-10 days) is said to sway pink, but neither have gotten good result (for reasons we already talked about) So you may want to start off with them and drop them and start doing every 2-4 day release for DH with the one attempt.

Prayingpinkgirl
January 25th, 2018, 01:29 PM
edit and rewrote above!

Prayingpinkgirl
January 25th, 2018, 01:30 PM
Ok, so we will try DH release every 4 days. with 1 attempt at + opk....now does it matter when that last release happens to fall. Say for instance dh's last release falls on the day before +opk when we will bd...is that ok?

Princessclare
January 25th, 2018, 02:16 PM
How many releases on day of baby dance do I dump ??? Before the one attempt baby dance is wed this week x

Prayingpinkgirl
January 29th, 2018, 03:28 PM
Hey Atomic, just a quick question before I have start baby dancing lol....If dh is releasing every couple days before our 1 attempt. 1. Should there be any abstinence before the 1 bd like 24 hours, 48 hours etc. 2. If the release falls on same day as bd is that good or bad. I understand the releasing every 2-4 days. But as we get closer to the day of out 1 attempt. Is there any instructions I should be sharing with dh? Thank you so much!

atomic sagebrush
January 29th, 2018, 03:50 PM
edit and rewrote above!

did I answer your question before or after you rewrote it? Did I give you an adequate answer?

atomic sagebrush
January 29th, 2018, 04:01 PM
Ok, so we will try DH release every 4 days. with 1 attempt at + opk....now does it matter when that last release happens to fall. Say for instance dh's last release falls on the day before +opk when we will bd...is that ok?

No that is fine. As long as he's doing regular release like that, 2 back to back releases won't reduce his sperm count too far and he can still make a nice amount of healthy sperm for the one attempt! :agree:

atomic sagebrush
January 29th, 2018, 04:03 PM
How many releases on day of baby dance do I dump ??? Before the one attempt baby dance is wed this week x

??? It depends on what method you're doing.

If you're doing "hurry up FR" where you release once, dump it, then DTD as soon as you're able to, just ONE.

If you're doing abstain or daily release do not dump ANY releases the day of attempt.

The only method we ever used where people dumped more than one release in a day was "compressed FR" and most of the people who tried that, didn't even stick to it properly anyway. I wouldn't bother with compressed FR, but the directions are, have him release/dump it 2-3 times per day for 2-3 days before attempt and on the attempt, have him release and dump in the morning, have attempt at night.

atomic sagebrush
January 29th, 2018, 04:05 PM
Hey Atomic, just a quick question before I have start baby dancing lol....If dh is releasing every couple days before our 1 attempt. 1. Should there be any abstinence before the 1 bd like 24 hours, 48 hours etc. 2. If the release falls on same day as bd is that good or bad. I understand the releasing every 2-4 days. But as we get closer to the day of out 1 attempt. Is there any instructions I should be sharing with dh? Thank you so much!

1)No, if he's doing regular release every 2-4 days there does NOT need to be any special time before the one attempt. Just have it work out however it works out.

2)Doesn't matter

3)No special instructions

Prayingpinkgirl
January 29th, 2018, 04:27 PM
THANK YOU!...Yes, you answered my questions....Hopefully this is my lucky month!!

Prayingpinkgirl
February 6th, 2018, 11:55 AM
Hi Atomic, I just wanted you to review my 1 attempt and tell me what you think!....So my period ended 1/30. My dh Released 1/23, 1/26, 1/30, and 2/1. I got my first positive on wondfo actually 2/3 at 11p (CD 10) and blazin positive on wondfo and smiley face on cb advance on 2/4 at 11 am. My dh he didn't tell me until afterwards that he released at 10:30 am. We still BD'd at 3 pm because I knew he would be soooo into the Superbowl lol. The wondfo strips were still positive Monday, it started to lighten up by Monday night 2/5. I just hope that since he released a couple hours before we BD that there was still fresh sperm. Thank you for your input.

atomic sagebrush
February 6th, 2018, 05:02 PM
Sounds great to me! FX and pink dust headed your way!

Prayingpinkgirl
February 15th, 2018, 12:29 PM
Hi Atomic,

I just wanted to update you that I found out last night at either 8 or dpo (Valentines Day lol) that I am pregnant. Confirmed by an FRER and Clear blue digi. Now I am just praying for a healthy baby girl :)....But when you get a chance, I have not been able to find any info online about if husband masturbates prior to that 1 attempt. Does it lower sperm count-swaying girl or does it increase sperm count.....I know you don't want to say too much bc I am already pregnant. I am a big girl lol....I really just want to know.....All I know is he released every 3/4 days and I did the 1 attempt on superbowl sunday lol. I am thinking now I may have ovulated a day early being that I got my bpf a little early. Thank you for all your help!!

atomic sagebrush
February 16th, 2018, 11:51 AM
YOu mean right before? Or every 3-4 days?

If right before, it may sway pink because it lowers sperm count. If every 3-4 days that is better for sperm count BUT we have realy not found any of the frequency patterns to help at all and the one attempt is what is working. So you guys did one attempt, that is all good, don't worry about the frequency as we really aren't very concerned with that any more.

Prayingpinkgirl
February 16th, 2018, 03:01 PM
Yes, I was wondering about right before maybe 2 hours before our 1 attempt. Thank you.....Let the waiting period begin lol...I will keep you updated. :)

atomic sagebrush
February 17th, 2018, 01:50 PM
Ok. So it may sway pink, but at the same time it makes it harder to conceive and also has caused some people to miss the entire month when their hubby could not perform after having that release.

Greydore
February 17th, 2018, 03:42 PM
Jumping in because I知 wondering the same thing! I was so irritated at my husband because the night I was pretty sure was the best attempt night he pulled out. We had sex again later that night(did not pull out that time), and I did end up getting pregnant. So I guess it is possible to get pregnant right after DH releases, but I知 sure there are lots of factors that go into this. I was sure we missed that month because of that one little incident, lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

atomic sagebrush
February 18th, 2018, 03:07 PM
A lot of people WANT to do it that way. And yes it is possible, it's just that it tends to cause more trouble than it's worth.

Prayingpinkgirl
April 12th, 2018, 05:48 PM
Soooo I officially found out today through genetic testing that it is indeed a GIRL!! I AM SOO EXCITED. I am in disbelief!! Thank you for everything!

Parying4agirl
April 12th, 2018, 05:51 PM
Congratulations 🎀

atomic sagebrush
April 13th, 2018, 02:03 PM
Huge congrats! Please do an add your sway and/or add your data to our spreadsheet if you have the time!!! http://genderdreaming.com/forum/add-your-girl-sway-/

Walkiria
August 8th, 2018, 06:50 PM
wooow thank you so much for giving me this link to read really really helped me a lot, because despite i m so looking to get pregnat of a baby girl, i really have my doubts about so many thisngs in timing and how all works or not work, you explian it all so clear. Even for me that english is not m native language. Thank you so much!

iseeherinmydreams
August 8th, 2018, 11:23 PM
can you please send me the diet!? :) Ill DM you my email!

atomic sagebrush
August 9th, 2018, 11:24 AM
A few years ago I decided to just make a shorter version of LE Diet here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/16780-low-everything-diet-nutshell-version.html

And here are a couple FAQs that will help you! :)
https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/24628-le-diet-faq.html
https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/ttc-a-girl-best-practices/62533-le-diet-faq-2-mineral-madness-edition.html

Babymaking1984
January 18th, 2019, 04:53 PM
Hi all

I知 getting near O (CD10) and trying to decide when to dtd, I知 planning to do one attempt. I get that the shettles method has been debunked but on the girl stats, 4 day cut off has 80% success rate. Anyone have any thoughts on what day is beat and why the 4 day cut off has such good results. Thanks!

MiaMelb
January 19th, 2019, 03:49 AM
Hi all

I’m getting near O (CD10) and trying to decide when to dtd, I’m planning to do one attempt. I get that the shettles method has been debunked but on the girl stats, 4 day cut off has 80% success rate. Anyone have any thoughts on what day is beat and why the 4 day cut off has such good results. Thanks!

Scientific studies show the same numbers of girls conceived as boys of each day of the fertile window. O-4 has low odds of bfp so most aim for day of +opk which is likely O-1/-2 and has good odds of conception.

atomic sagebrush
January 19th, 2019, 03:14 PM
Hi all

I’m getting near O (CD10) and trying to decide when to dtd, I’m planning to do one attempt. I get that the shettles method has been debunked but on the girl stats, 4 day cut off has 80% success rate. Anyone have any thoughts on what day is beat and why the 4 day cut off has such good results. Thanks!

According to our most recent statistics https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/51473-complete-pink-swaying-statistics-spreadsheet-info-links-enter-your-sway.html 16 out of 21 people claimed they got a baby girl with that cutoff - about 76%. But science has indicated (and I mean, using modern technology to accurately pin down ovulation day) that the odds of getting pregnant with a true 4 day cutoff are really low. (and this is especially true with pink sways sicne swaying pink lowers chances of conception, esp. with cutoff)

Most, if not all, of the people who think they got pregnant with a 4 day cutoff in our statistics actually ovulated on a different day. And I know this because I've seen hundreds, if not thousands of people try to conceive with a 4 day cutoff while swaying and they couldn't. I have had people show up here after 2 years of 4 day cutoffs. In the real world it just doesn't work for people until/unless they ovulate early.

I believe those statistics to be false and misleading - most if not all of them did not have sex 4 days before ovulation. But what they did do, most of them anyway, was have 1 attempt. For reasons we can only guess at, 1 attempt has been quite pink friendly - between 70-75% most of the time of the site (it's down a bit now but I believe that's because so many people have showed up and NOT done diet but relied on 1 attempt to sway for them). If you take a sample size of 16 of 21 people (76%) and have only ONE sway go another way from luck, that bumps the results to 71%, roughly what the one attempt was getting most of the time. If you have two sways go the other way, that These small sample sizes are really not very helpful because so much of this comes down to luck (plus not to mention the other things people were doing to sway) and they realy don't mean what people think they mean.

Long story short, it's a fluke.

I am 1 million percent convinced timing does nothing for swaying, I got 4 of my 5 as timing opposites (and the 5th was a sneak attack, he might have been a timing opposite too for all I know) So while i'ts fine to start off using timing if you'd like, please do a reasonable cutoff you can actually get pregnant with - 2 or 3 days, max - and drop it before adding attempts. DK if you noticed this but the first post in this thread has a really long involved exploration and debunking of timing.

Babymaking1984
January 23rd, 2019, 12:45 PM
Thank you Atomic! Makes sense to me!

I have one more question, I知 CD 15 (I generally OV on CD14, think diet may have delayed it) using clear blue dual tests and got my second flashy face today and have EWCM, do you think I should DTD today or wait till tomorrow? I seem to OV quite quickly after LH surge and I don稚 want to miss it as only doing 1 attempt. How many days of flashy face do people generally get? Thank you!

atomic sagebrush
January 24th, 2019, 03:15 PM
People get all different amounts of flashy smileys, esp. when swaying unfortunately.

If you're just starting off and in no hurry to conceive it's fine to have an attempt slightly on the early side. For all you know you'll get pregnant that way, and if not then we can move it a little closer in the future.

Danny xx
January 22nd, 2020, 04:29 PM
Hi I知 new to this but I would really like a list of the full diet for pink/girl sway. Also does dairy calcium and magnesium help to sway pink and so confused on the coffee drinking because it痴 says a no no on every other site any help would be much appreciated thankyou xx

atomic sagebrush
January 23rd, 2020, 12:07 PM
HI Danny!

I'll give you a short answer first and then please check out the links below for thorough answers to all your questions.

The short answer is, the other sites are wrong. They continue to use this old outdated information that has been completely debunked by modern science and most of us on here got opposites using those methods. The entire reason we started this site is because so many of us got the "wrong" genders doing things those ways. I got 2 boys with those old methods of swaying before I decided "there has got to be a better way" and started doing my own research into actual science instead of those old outdated things and in the end I did get a girl!

I know it's really irritating when our site doesn't do things the same way, but the reason is because we want you guys to have successful sways. We want you to get your desired gender, and those old methods just don't work. I am always happy to explain why the old ways don't work and why our methods do so whenever you have any confusion please just ask, that's what I'm here for. I answer every question asked.

Now, the longer answer:

Here is the Low Everything Diet we use: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/16780-low-everything-diet-nutshell-version.html

I have a general FAQ for diet here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-to-conceive-a-girl/24628-le-diet-faq.html

And a mineral FAQ that will help answer your questions about calcium and magnesium - long story short, I would keep dairy within LE Diet limits, do NOT have those massive amounts of dairy the other sites recommend, and if you wish to use cal-mag I leave that up to you just be sure you don't take Vitamin D with it : https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/ttc-a-girl-best-practices/62533-le-diet-faq-2-mineral-madness-edition.html

And as for coffee, they're just wrong, wrong, wrong on that. It's all based on scientific studies that were debunked ages ago. Coffee has been a great sway for us, I got my 4 boys without coffee and my girl with it, and it's a shame they keep recommending not to drink it because we've had such good results and it's such an easy thing to do. I have a full explanation of that here: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum/gender-swaying-general-discussion/56791-vices-swaying.html