Attachment 4948Attachment 4948Attachment 4949Attachment 4950
Opinions please.
One measured 12 + 1 the other 11 + 5
Thanks in advance x
Printable View
Attachment 4948Attachment 4948Attachment 4949Attachment 4950
Opinions please.
One measured 12 + 1 the other 11 + 5
Thanks in advance x
I honestly can't see a nub in any of the photos. I know you are frightened about the gender but I really think you have nothing to worry about. Try and relax, you will be fine xxxx
The nub area is not seen. Sorry. I'm sure they are your girls. Lightning cannot strike twice.
Ok thanks lovelies x
Just a question - were they both 'created' at the same time and put back at the same time?
If so, then have they given you any indication as to why they have different dates? My scanner said that EVERY baby measures EXACTLY the same up until 16 weeks but I've always known the earliest I could have conceived and they've said I conceived before that!
What??? Every baby measures the same? That's just not accurate at all! Every baby is different and there is a range of what is normal for each gestation. I would expect them to be different. Maybe you misunderstood.Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern_Shutterbug
Nope, they said they could give exact conception date as up until 16 weeks each baby has the same femur length, head circumference and abdominal size.
That is what I was told too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Northern_Shutterbug
So how do they come up with the different dates we see then? We get early measurements with the heartbeat u/s and they are all different
I'm with NBP. Everyone I know who has had twins (as well women on this board) had twins measuring different from the get go. Like NBP said, every child is different- especially fraternal twins with separate placentas, etc- it would be almost freakish to have them grow at the exact same rate?? Identical twins maybe, but not fraternal!!