Printable View
She had an elective u/s at 18 weeks and they said 95% GIRL. Yesterday at her Dr appointment he said "they told you girl? The legs are closed in every picture. Let's do another u/s to get this right". He seems to think the baby isn't a girl based on these pictures. Thoughts??Attachment 17752Attachment 17753
None of my boys looked like that....I think it looks pretty girly :)
I think the reason they say that is because if the legs are closed tightly enough to squash a scrotum it *could* look girly. I don't know how common it is that it happens, but I guess enough where closed-legged potty shots are more skeptical.
That said, I have a shot of my daughter at 19 weeks that looks almost identical to this one. (We knew from a 16 week sono that she was clearly a girl and not squishing anything). I'd say it looks girly. But some double checking never hurts anyone.