Printable View
Hi ladies
Im 9 weeks 5 days , I had un ultrasound and I asked the Dr wheres the yolk sac , she said at the left of the uturs ( it was at the right of the screen) i swayed for a boy and I was confident with my sway
Could the yolk sac change place at this point? Cuz I thought I saw it at the left of the same screen at 5 weeks
Im so sad , if everything I did didnt work , then I dunno what will :(
according to the Ramzi, 9 weeks would be too late to tell. I don't believe a word of it anyway, but no matter what, yours wouldn't be an accurate guess that far along
Thank you kasey
I hope its wrong , 4 more weeks to know
Ramzi isn't accurate at all don't let you down by this. All your chances are still open!
:fx:
Sway is never 100 percent reliable, HT is....
I don't buy Ramzi, if it worked it would be in use by every ultrasound place by now.
Thnx alot , I feel more calm now
I will know after 4 weeks in 4th Jan
"Imagning its a boy"
Well, she's pregnant now, so no point in telling her that! :/ No one on this site has ever said swaying is anywhere near 100% reliable anyway. Never, ever, ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisvna
Not everyone can do HT and it really makes hard feelings for those of us who cannot afford to go HT!
Ramzi is one of those "fun" things right now. Its kinda like shettles to me because its one of those cases they showed all this high success in the study and so far no one has tried or in Shettles case been able to duplicate the results to call it Shettles LAW instead of shettles method/theory. The other thing you have to remember is a tech can rotate and mirror the images. So one of your scans could have been mirrored and you didn't know it. The yolk sack can "move" but its not going to be all over the place as it is attached to baby.
So you have a better idea of how it is contained.
Attachment 22485
Thnx ladies !
That was so helpful Nahri ! In the picture the yolk sac is at the right and the baby atached to the left !
My first ultrasound looked very similar to this diagram the sac was firmly behind the head and baby attached at the right. With my DS the sac was dead middle and you could see the start of the villi on the right. But I knew nothing of ramzi at that time and do not know if that image was mirrored. This time I know I got a true image and the theory points to girl. Im sort of on the lets see how many I can disprove at one time. Moon phase, chinese gender, ramzi, and a couple old wives tales say girl for me. So in the end it will either be coincidence of the 50/50 shot or just wrong lol its going to be fun just to see :)