Have been browsing for this but can't find - has the theory on sex position affecting gender been debunked?
Thanks !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
Have been browsing for this but can't find - has the theory on sex position affecting gender been debunked?
Thanks !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd love to see the replies to this also ! I've always read missionary was best for girl with shallow penetration but since I've been planning a sway I've asked all my friends with girls how they were conceived and almost all said girl on top or doggy style.Quote:
Originally Posted by frankie2017
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interested to read responses.
Both my girls were conceived with missionary.
I don't think it works for a couple reasons.
Practically all blue swayers have heard that "doggy" is the magic boy position and so people do that even when doing nothing else to sway. (this is actually the first thing I personally ever heard of when it comes to gender swaying IRL) But blue swayers still get plenty of opposites and practically all those opposites were doggy! If the a#1 position doesn't work, then how can any of the other, less effective positions be doing anything at all??
And more importantly, if gender swaying works, it has to be for a REASON. It has to be something that helps the human race to survive to pass down genes to future generations either put into us by a higher power or else evolution. Things like diet, exercise, even number of attempts make sense because baby boys need more nutrients and a parental lifestyle that is conducive to them growing up big and strong and protected to hand down those genes to future generations. If a boy does not have enough nutrients to grow up to pass down genes, it matters not if his parents would be DTD doggy style or missionary. Just doesn't add up. I suppose it could be some kind of accident of fate but that would be a pretty insane accident!
(and the idea that God would be sitting around thinking "ya know what would be hilarious, if people had to do doggy style to get a boy" - sorry I just find that idea totally ridiculous!)
I believe shallow release has singlehandedly caused more BFN than anything else (except maybe the crazy douching 10 times in a row which we don't do on this site anyway).Quote:
Originally Posted by Traumarn
I really can't recommend it after seeing tons of people who dropped literaly every other sway tactic and did not get pregnant. I was pulling out every weapon in my arsenal and even having them do blue sway stuff to conceive, only to find out after a year that they were still doing shallow release!! If you MUST start off doing shallow release, up to you, but eventually you have got to kick it to the curb, preferably before adding attempts!
Like I said, nearly every blue sway opposite ever was doggy style!
I believe shallow release has singlehandedly caused more BFN than anything else (except maybe the crazy douching 10 times in a row which we don't do on this site anyway).Quote:
Originally Posted by Traumarn
I really can't recommend it after seeing tons of people who dropped literaly every other sway tactic and did not get pregnant. I was pulling out every weapon in my arsenal and even having them do blue sway stuff to conceive, only to find out after a year that they were still doing shallow release!! If you MUST start off doing shallow release, up to you, but eventually you have got to kick it to the curb, preferably before adding attempts!
Like I said, nearly every blue sway opposite ever was doggy style!
[emoji23][emoji23]Quote:
Originally Posted by atomic sagebrush
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk