Oh it's ok girls IF i was lucky enough to have the option to put 3 back there is not a hope in hell I would even consider it!!
Printable View
Oh it's ok girls IF i was lucky enough to have the option to put 3 back there is not a hope in hell I would even consider it!!
Gee that is a lot to transfer with your background.
yeah that's what I was thinking!
I'm 27 AND have fertility problems, and my Dr wouldn't even put that many back.
I agree, it's crazy to put back 3 but a lot of Dr's do recomend it, I think even Dr Potter has done this, im sure waiting 4 elle transfered 3? I might be wrong there and maybe 1 split but I think he put back 3. My limit is 2. I would be happy to have twins, extatic even:) triplets would be welcomed also but the complications of multiple pregnancies are not worth it. There is too much chance of something going wrong.
He did but she was 40 but still, all 3 took and I know CC trasnferred 3 each time. Got one and then 2.
My dr had me to sign a release to put back 2!! He says because I am under 35 and if they are perfect he recommends only 1.
No way would I put back 3! Good luck!
I recently read something about how SET sometimes have a better success rate (when done with GSN or aCGH) than putting more in more than 1..... something about how if one dies then it causes the other to die too. However, I have read if you do PGD then putting back 2 will double your chance of success. I have never heard anything about putting 3 back unless you have greater problems with quantity/quality and are a mature mama.
i think u should put 2 ,good luck