Data even indicates high maternal testosterone = smaller baby so right there that doesn't indicate that could possibly be true.
Printable View
Data even indicates high maternal testosterone = smaller baby so right there that doesn't indicate that could possibly be true.
Placenta location could be true because my boys had an posterior placenta and this one has an anterior placenta.
Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
All my boys were postieror too this one is anterior
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Are you having a boy or a girl now? Or team green?
Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
If your Talking to me I find out thursdayQuote:
Originally Posted by Mickey2014
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Yes it was to you [emoji6] very exiting!!
Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk
Thanks ladies! I get scanned every visit and have been measuring exactly on date until a few weeks ago when it shot ahead, maybe a growth spurt?! Sometimes I think too much information is not good during this process, it gets u thinking. I'm also starting to get anxious about the whole birthing process, they told me my first son was very big and I should have a csection - he wasn't, I had him naturally and if anything he was under weight.
Incidentally, I'm carrying very small, people don't believe how far along I am and I'm not a big person to begin with, I'm putting this down to a posterior placenta, I was definitely more 'out' last time!
It's probably baby's position or having gained a bit of extra chub in the midsection. It is probaby not baby's size because babies just don't gain massive amounts of weight overnight that can make your stomach pop out. we're talking ounces here