Yep side shot at your last scan is perfect timing for accurate nub did you get any side pics or a video?
Printable View
Yep side shot at your last scan is perfect timing for accurate nub did you get any side pics or a video?
Quote:
Originally Posted by atomic sagebrush
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kazzzz
Yes I got side shots!!!! Can you take a look?
Attachment 43594Attachment 43595Attachment 43596Attachment 43597Attachment 43598Attachment 43598Attachment 43598Attachment 43599Attachment 43600Attachment 43601Attachment 43602Attachment 43602Attachment 43603
50-50. I felt that the tech's opinion was more valuable than any of the pictures as they see more than us, and the nub was quite long, but overall I think it's best to stick with 50-50.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vame
Unfortunately these are not great for guessing on because most of them are focused on the leg, not the nub. My gut instinct says girl but my brain says "stick with 50-50"
You dont see something “stacked” on the nub? I feel like there is something there…. But I also sometimes see the long nub, still.Quote:
Originally Posted by atomic sagebrush
Also have a new potty shot (but I know what you said, pottyshots are not great at this gestation)Attachment 43607
I'm 50-50 on everything I've seen up to this point. I looked carefully and I am 50-50 with a slight girl lean based more on what the tech said than anything in the photos.
I don't think that's genitals in the above photo. May be hand or cord. It looks to me like it's coming from the side and not the crotch area.
This is a tricky little nub but i would go with what the tec said. The pic with the arrow looks just like my last sons pic. I understand wanting a girl i also have 3 boys and I'm girl swaying. Look up the nub experts on Facebook they are very good
Just os everyone knows, the nub experts on Facebook have given a lot of wrong info. I'm glad for anyone they worked for but we've had a lot of people who were getting guesses on pictures that no one should have been guessing on (like, 10 weeks, and pictures that didn't even have genitals on them)
Ok Vame, I have a picture for you to look at in this thread: https://www.genderdreaming.com/forum...good-news.html
We already know this babe is a boy from NIPT tests, plus it's further along than your shots are and so potty is more reliable (tho I'd still not have guessed gender based on potty, we know it's a boy from the NIPT). Do you see, though, how much SMALLER the goods are than the one on your pictures? That is what a boy baby looks like from the bottom - the penis just sticks out a bit from the crotch, not all the way to the knees practically. The stuff going on in your pictures is simply not identifiable by the potty shot; the first set of photos is just not reliable because it's SO HUGE that it's clearly a trick of camera and developmental phase, and the second shot is way too wide and big to be a penis. Also, please look and see the other 'stuff' there, that can't be genitals but you can see that if Blue's pic was the least bit less focused, it would be very easy for all that to blend together.