2nd beta came back... was 111 on 14 dpo and 252 on 16 dpo. So it did double in 48 hours and doc said looks good so far. First appt is Feb 27!
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Printable View
2nd beta came back... was 111 on 14 dpo and 252 on 16 dpo. So it did double in 48 hours and doc said looks good so far. First appt is Feb 27!
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Yay Abc!! That’s fantastic news! [emoji7][emoji8]
6/2003 [emoji1349]2/2009 [emoji1407] 12/2012 [emoji1349]4/2015 [emoji1406] 2015 [emoji1356] 2016 [emoji1413] The Lord Answered my [emoji1317] 2017🤰due June 2018, with a [emoji1405][emoji166]to fit into our crazy bunch! [emoji7][emoji8]
Thanks Mommy. It still seems so LOW but I guess the fact that it doubled is fine. You had lower numbers in the beginning too, right? I asked the doc about it still being low and he said it's early and it doubled, so it's fine. I just see everyone else's crazy high numbers and think mine should be higher too I guess :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mommy2apples
Thanks Mommy. It still seems so LOW but I guess the fact that it doubled is fine. You had lower numbers in the beginning too, right? I asked the doc about it still being low and he said it's early and it doubled, so it's fine. I just see everyone else's crazy high numbers and think mine should be higher too I guess :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mommy2apples
Mine were low ABC.
I’ll get the numbers for you
6/2003 [emoji1349]2/2009 [emoji1407] 12/2012 [emoji1349]4/2015 [emoji1406] 2015 [emoji1356] 2016 [emoji1413] The Lord Answered my [emoji1317] 2017🤰due June 2018, with a [emoji1405][emoji166]to fit into our crazy bunch! [emoji7][emoji8]
Oct 25: 3 weeks 5 days
49
Oct 27: 4 weeks
131
Oct 31: 4wks4
601
Nov 9: 5wks6
9,776
6/2003 [emoji1349]2/2009 [emoji1407] 12/2012 [emoji1349]4/2015 [emoji1406] 2015 [emoji1356] 2016 [emoji1413] The Lord Answered my [emoji1317] 2017🤰due June 2018, with a [emoji1405][emoji166]to fit into our crazy bunch! [emoji7][emoji8]
Don’t compare yours to others, I actually took a hiatus until I got all my results, because I was freaking myself out comparing to others. She’s perfect, and your baby is perfect too! [emoji8]
6/2003 [emoji1349]2/2009 [emoji1407] 12/2012 [emoji1349]4/2015 [emoji1406] 2015 [emoji1356] 2016 [emoji1413] The Lord Answered my [emoji1317] 2017🤰due June 2018, with a [emoji1405][emoji166]to fit into our crazy bunch! [emoji7][emoji8]
You can't compare to others though. It's a doubling game. You can start with anything from 0 to 5 hcg in your system (all of which are entirely normal) and so a person who starts with 0 will have less than a person who starts off at 5 but the pregnancy is still developing properly.Quote:
Originally Posted by ABC.2606
0
1
2
4
8
16
versus
5
10
20
40
80
160
Looking at the numbers one would say wow the pregnancy at 16 is much lower that the 160 but both pregnancies are doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing! Doubling is what counts! Imagine this - a woman could start off at 5 and NOT have doubling, her pregnancy may not even be working out, but would still be higher than a pregnancy developing normally that started off at 0 or 1 or 2 hcg! Don't compare numbers!
I'm freaking out that mine might be too high, like multiples too high... trying to calm myself down. Found another chart that was more reassuring.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mommy2apples
Let's all stop worrying about betas. I saw some people on the chart have single digits and had normal babies.
Sent from my SM-G955U
Wondering do betas only get done outside the uk? I’ve nevee been offered them or know anyone that has.