Due March/April/May 2017

Out of 3 pregnancies, that chart only has one gender correct, if I add on a year for me turning the next age that year, then it has 2 correct x

With the Chinese gender chart I'm 50/50 one right one wrong.
Baby number 3 is 'meant' to be a girl oh please I hope so!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burakoam

Brandles- can't say wether it's right for my first cause it starts at 18 and I got pregnant with her at 16 but I can tell you for my two others if that chart was right they should have been males. However it depends on how you read the chart... I always heard you are supposed to use the age you are going to be that year... So even if you are 26 as an example, if you have a birthday that year where you would turn 27 then you go by 27 as the age of conception... So if I do that then yeah it says they Should be girls. Thing is that it never specifically wth any of these charts says "add a year" and it's sort of silly

What's funny is in this case wether I use the chart as is or add a year it says this baby should be a boy... Guess we will find out

---

Yeah, from what I know most chart have you use your lunar age and month... and I think in this case the Dr said to just use your true age. Praying it's wrong!!!! Lol!!!!!!! I don't really put too much faith in these things anyways. But thought it was interesting that all mine were right except I couldn't do my oldest either since I was 17 when I got pregnant with him.

The chart has been right for me every time, and says this one is a girl, right again.

The chart was wrong for 2 right for 2

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Burakoam

Brandles- can't say wether it's right for my first cause it starts at 18 and I got pregnant with her at 16 but I can tell you for my two others if that chart was right they should have been males. However it depends on how you read the chart... I always heard you are supposed to use the age you are going to be that year... So even if you are 26 as an example, if you have a birthday that year where you would turn 27 then you go by 27 as the age of conception... So if I do that then yeah it says they Should be girls. Thing is that it never specifically wth any of these charts says "add a year" and it's sort of silly

What's funny is in this case wether I use the chart as is or add a year it says this baby should be a boy... Guess we will find out

---

The chart is correct if I don't add the year. My boys were conceived in January and I was 28 and 31 at the time but I turned 29 and 32 in the November (after they were born!). If I go by the age I turned it doesn't work. Also the gender chart says Girl for this one but Boy if I go by the age I'm turning (37). I prefer going by the actual age at conception :)

Anyway, as Atomic says, if the Chinese gender chart was actually accurate they wouldn't have so many unwanted baby girls in China!

Charts right for me only once. My second regardless of I add a year or not. Im hoping its wrong again as its saying girl for me. I think it's 50/50 as purples said if it was anywhere near accurate they would be no unwanted babies and probably only males born in China!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by baby2016baby

Charts right for me only once. My second regardless of I add a year or not. Im hoping its wrong again as its saying girl for me. I think it's 50/50 as purples said if it was anywhere near accurate they would be no unwanted babies and probably only males born in China!!!!

---

I don't put too much faith in these, but thought it would be fun and I am glad to see that it didn't work for everyone!!! :)


I know you ladies are really going to think I am CRAZY... lol!!!!! Anyways, my friend told me about this site that analyzes your ultrasound with the Ramzi theory. I sent mine in... and the results say Baby GIRL. Ultimately, I obviously just want a healthy baby regardless of the gender, but the waiting game this time around is seriously killing me.

They said: Your personalized results: Your placenta favors the left side of your uterus based on rotation requisites. This view is due the angle your technician used during the scan.

Attachment 32920

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cinss

The chart has been right for me every time, and says this one is a girl, right again.

---

I tried searching posts... did I miss the post with your gender results?

Brandles whats the site. I had someone over on IG that seems to have pretty good accuracy with these say mine was a boy per ramzi and our babies are in pretty similar positions...was yours done abdominally or transvaginally? i think i read from a tech somewhere that the initial idea one is mirrored and the other is not is wrong so they are both actually mirrored so what appears to be left will be right and vice versa