Printable View
Not sure what they are getting into these days, but twice for me with two seperate pregnancies I did their fetal gender testing. BOTH WERE WRONG. A Dr Kuldeep Verma was the point of contact there at that time. I would be very cautious of this company based on past experience. They seem to like to dabble into new ideas and use us women as their lab rats, instead of holding an actual trial for accuracy.
Good luck all you swayers out there...
WoW! Did you see that?
Urobiologics posts results for mary98083, a boy with 99% confidence. So they found same hormonal composition in both precon and postcon samples. Would be worth watching. Don't have much to say.
OMG!! BOTH were wrong!!! I KNOW I said I wasn't going to stress about this and what would be wold be for us but OMG I suddenly am freaking out over this!!! Don't know what's wrong with me. I want a baby girl so much, I was/am really hoping this test is accurate but I know it's not proven either way and there's definetely no guarantee of getting your desired gender but I can still hope :worry:Quote:
Originally Posted by 5littlegirls
It would have been better for uroboilogics if they weren't coming from such a known faulty background as their early dna gender tests, I've heard so many stories of incorrect results. I would find it hard to believe anything they came it with as science even with proof kwim? A bit like the boy who cried wolf.
Hi 5littlegirls, sorry to miss your post. Just got carried away in excitement.Quote:
Originally Posted by 5littlegirls
Yes that should be of concern. When did that happen? I remember Dr. Verma told us that there were two instances when his accuracy fell from 95% to almost 50% due to internal laboratory problems. He came to know of those much after when wrong reports started pouring in. But now he is in good control and still admitted strange things can happen.
Elle, you are right in that one should be ready for anything. Still, their service and concept appears to be better than other tests in market.
Hope they keep the entry for mary98083 for long there and do not delete it.
Ok, now it's clear to me! Totally a scam!
Accuracy fell from 95% to 50%, due to internal laboratory problems? Yeah right!
I'm keeping my money to buy some really expensive baby outfits ;)
Wilma, we shouldn't say that cuz those instances were very old. like one case he mentioned when they started this test in 1999. They found their test was developed on Indian women, who are mostly vegetarians. they spotted problems with American samples and realized that their old methods cannot be used with non-vegetarians. So they halted testing for two months and reset methods to cover all types of samples. Come on people they honestly admit their mistake and recovered from those things.Quote:
Originally Posted by wilma_five
What methods are you using to get your girl, Wilma?
Today I have some time to spare so I'll be hanging around a bit lol.
I am laughing right now: you wrote 'uroboilogics'Quote:
Originally Posted by ELP
What do you have to gain here Koko?? I'm just not sure why you are so vehemently defending - selling - something that clearly you're getting a lot of resistance about? Are you even a swayer...?
Yes, I am a swayer and testing various options. I'm open to anything that works. DH wants to go for only the best. He's that type. And I know 'nothing in this field is best' and all a game of chance.Quote:
Originally Posted by hopingforsaskia