is microsort still availeble ?

Printable View

June 23rd, 2012, 03:12 PM
roze strikje

is microsort still availeble ?

Hello , did MS in Fairfax 5 years ago.
I was participaiten a clinical trial , i would like to know what they descided.
As i dont speak very good englisch , their site , i can not translate it.
Many thanks.
June 23rd, 2012, 03:18 PM
michaela

It is no longer available in the US. It is available in Mexico.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
June 23rd, 2012, 03:27 PM
Lotte

hi roze strikje, volgens mij had die ene kliniek op cyprus het ook beschikbaar (NIET Genesis/ savvas) maar Lisvna weet het vast wel.
June 24th, 2012, 01:49 PM
roze strikje

Why they dont have the permission ? is something not good with kids from MS ???? i am worried.
June 24th, 2012, 02:33 PM
lisvna

They still offer it in Mexico and Cyprus (north Cyprus ivf clinic). It's not proven its harmfull to the kids. Why are you worried? Maybe it's an ethical issue?
June 24th, 2012, 02:39 PM
nuthinbutpink

They actually never said why. There were moral objections that I know. I think there was some worry about the dye, laser and sperm damage but I don't think there was data to support that.
June 25th, 2012, 03:34 AM
lisvna

I agree with NBP
June 25th, 2012, 08:20 AM
AnnaG1

I read that by the FDA's own admission Microsort was considered safe ..However there was no "public health benefit" from Microsort so that's why no FDA approval.
June 27th, 2012, 04:21 AM
Dr. Potter

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnaG1

I read that by the FDA's own admission Microsort was considered safe ..However there was no "public health benefit" from Microsort so that's why no FDA approval.

The application was pulled by the owners the owners for economic reasons. The FDA was asking for a $4,000,000 study to validate the bleach cleaning of the machine between uses BEFORE they would consider the application for a full committee. This type of thing is usually done afterwards as a contingency once approval has been granted. They felt that with PGD pregnancy rates being as high as they are that the market did I not justify this expense (or they did not have the money on hand to do it). There were not safety concerns with the off spring in the final data.That being said, I cannot be sure that what is being done in Mexico and elsewhere is the same process, is safe or works as well. They have not presented any data as of today. I will be curious to see if they do. If it is working well they probably would present at least preliminary data as an abstract. So far nothing.
June 27th, 2012, 05:41 AM
roze strikje

Thanks you , yesterdat called my colaborateur who helped us , and he told me TO NOT worried .
She IS healthy , very sweet and beautifull .....
So glad we did it ...
To everyone who is busy with the trajest ;
"Keep following your deam and be strong !"
July 29th, 2012, 03:09 PM
riesling

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Potter

The application was pulled by the owners the owners for economic reasons. The FDA was asking for a $4,000,000 study to validate the bleach cleaning of the machine between uses BEFORE they would consider the application for a full committee. This type of thing is usually done afterwards as a contingency once approval has been granted. They felt that with PGD pregnancy rates being as high as they are that the market did I not justify this expense (or they did not have the money on hand to do it). There were not safety concerns with the off spring in the final data.That being said, I cannot be sure that what is being done in Mexico and elsewhere is the same process, is safe or works as well. They have not presented any data as of today. I will be curious to see if they do. If it is working well they probably would present at least preliminary data as an abstract. So far nothing.

The FDA approval process was widely seen as the main reason Microsort was limiting usage to family balancing. Yet now that they have apparently given up on the FDA, Microsort's two Mexico facilities still impose this market-shrinking limitation. What's up with that? Is Microsort simply being run by the world's worst marketers, as well as being seriously undercapitalized? And if they can't properly manage the technology themselves (which I'm guessing many of the people who have been following the Microsort story in hopes of unrestricted use for the past 10+ years very firmly believe), are they at least looking for well-capitalized investors who could fire all the current managers and properly bring this technology to market?
July 29th, 2012, 03:39 PM
nuthinbutpink

Why can't Microsort be used without FDA approval just like Ericsson is? They don't have any kind of approval and they still sell spinning services. Why can't Microsort reopen under another name and offer services?