2nd Opinion Wanted!!!

At 16 weeks I had an early gender determination done at a boutique. The baby wouldn't corporate too much with their positioning but we got a couple rear shots with legs apart. The tech did a short 3D video for us to see...it was awesome but had us guessing the baby was a boy, then on 2D the tech pointed and said "girl!" The 3D she said is misleading because we got a clear shot of her but the area is just swollen and appears like a penis would, she was very confident on her answer. I just thought I'd see what anyone else though, we're excited either way! We return to our OB in 3 weeks for an ultrasound where they will reveal gender as well. Let me know what y'all think!! Thanks!! =)http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/11/naterehe.jpghttp://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/11/jamava5u.jpg

The two pics show the booty end up. The link below shows the 3D short video.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/vm4c9hga34rmra2/VIDEO_3.AVI


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk - now Free

This is the shot in the video that made us wonder....http://img.tapatalk.com/d/13/09/11/7yma2aqa.jpg

I think its a girl, possibly swollen bits!

I think its a girl too. My third girls 3D looked the same and I thought she was a boy. (Swollen bits) The 2D shots are better to determine gender.

Sorry I tried to add a photo but it wont let me do it from my phone.

Thanks ladies!

It's good to hear other 3D images showed swollen bits.

Does anyone have any confirmed girl 3D images to compare?? Thanks!!

3d is no good for gender guessing so I would say tats a girl :)

looks like a girl :) congrats

Girl!

Thanks everyone for the input!! Making me feel more reassured! Hopefully I can start shopping soon and won't be having to return the pink!! =)

Very girly! Congrats!