Taken at 16 weeks 0 days. Tech said 100% boy. What do you ladies think? The lines confuse me.
*updated with 3D pic*
Printable View
Taken at 16 weeks 0 days. Tech said 100% boy. What do you ladies think? The lines confuse me.
*updated with 3D pic*
I agree this is a very confusing shot!!I
I'm sorry I am not sure either
doesn't it almost look like the top part of that middle line isn't really connected? Could the cord (or something else??) have been between the legs? It is confusing..
That's what confuses me too. I read that boys can have what looks like three lines but it will protrude from the body. In this picture at least, it looks like the lines are set more into the body.Quote:
Originally Posted by mamato3girls
I would have guessed girl. Nobody can say that is a boy off this shot. Where are the testicles?? It looks like a girl.
I agree I don't think that is a boy.
the potty shot looks girl to me
I agree with everyone else. Looking at this potty shot I would say that's a girl. Was this at the dr's or an elective gender scan? If it was an elective I would call and say that you want a second ultrasound for free to confirm because you got a second opinion and were told that it was not a boy. If it was a tech through the dr's office I would call the dr's and complain. Either way congrats on your beautiful baby!
Looks pretty vaginay lol
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Wanting-a-girl
That's what throws me off. It looks like there's a nub sticking out but then again I don't see any obvious scrotum. DS's was very obvious. Do girls still have a nub at 16 weeks?Quote:
Originally Posted by nuthinbutpink
I'm posting the 3D shot of baby's parts. I see a nub sticking out but no scrotum. Shouldn't a scrotum be visible if it's a boy?
Attachment 14142
Thank you!Quote:
Originally Posted by tmbabcock
It was an elective scan. The tech said she was 100% sure baby is a boy. I don't know why but I can't help but doubt that. With DS I had no doubt he was all boy.
3D pics shouldn't ever be used for gender. They don't show enough detail. And from the 3d pics I have seen of little boys you can usually see a scrotum. Especially with a shot like that. That could easily be a swollen clitoris in the 3D pic. I would definitely call and tell them you want another ultrasound for free because you got a second opinion and was told that it was not a boy. Almost all elective places offer a second ultrasound for free if the gender determination was not successful or questioned.
I know this is CRAZY old, but was this baby a boy or girl? I have a very similar image and am curious!Quote:
Originally Posted by ksmom
B
This looks girly to me!
Oh thank so much[emoji254][emoji3590]I feel that like ur baby ultrasound is it? Or no [emoji28]Quote:
Originally Posted by atomic sagebrush
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, it's not mine. She actually ended up having a boy but I think yours is a girl.
Did you see that her picture had a much longer line in the middle than yours did and all of us were confused about it??
Your picture is much more of a classic girl shot.
Yes u r rightQuote:
Originally Posted by atomic sagebrush
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk