Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 78
  1. #1

    Indigoviolet's FINAL update, p.7

    I don't get the fact that on one picture the baby is on the right and on another the left. If anyone could shed any light, I'd really appreciate it! Got my 12 week scan in a week and starting to obsess!
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    Last edited by indigoviolet; March 20th, 2012 at 04:15 PM.
    2007 2010 2012



  2. #2
    Site Owner
    nuthinbutpink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    The Internet
    Posts
    24,572
    Here is an interesting post I found about this theory-

    The lady's pic looks like yours!

    I can't see your uterus in these pictures because these pictures are both magnifications of a small area in your uterus.* The only way to know if your baby has attached to the left or right walls of your uterus would be during the scan. The tech would have to find your uterine wall and then find the conceptus. It's a bit like scrolling around your town on Google Maps while looking for your own home. * The oval rings that you see around the baby aren't the uterus (The uterus appears as 3 striated lines.), those are rings are caused by the soundwaves bouncing through fat and muscle so think of them like a topographical map.* I can tell you that the baby is on the left side of the placenta.* Even though it appears to be on the right, you have to remember that you were laying down and facing the technician.* It's a mirror image.
    Mom to

    and my IVF/PGD

    Become a Dream Member to access the private forums

  3. #3
    The tough thing with Ramzi is it isn't where the baby is attached, it's where the placenta is developing, and those can be in different areas. If you read his paper it is VERY tough to identify which side the placenta is on without the appropriate equipment mapping bloodflow. What they did on IG to guess (and had like 70/30) success, I believe, was look at where the brightest, thickest white part of the placenta was on the photo, so where the MOST white area is on the side of the sac, and that was where they assumed the placenta to be developing.

    On yours it looks to me like it's pretty thick all the way around, LOL I think Ramzi is really a tough thing to guess off of photos.

  4. #4
    thanks NBP, wow, that's so interesting! I really thought that was the walls of the uterus you could see. Makes much more sense now with this explanation.
    when you say 'baby appears left side of the placenta' that doesn't mean left of uterus though does it? (I wish!)
    2007 2010 2012



  5. #5
    Thanks Begonia, it is confusing but at least I know why now!
    2007 2010 2012



  6. #6
    Right, 12 week scan tomorrow, will post nub pic if I get a good one. Wish me luck!!! (sooo nervous!)
    2007 2010 2012



  7. #7
    I'm terrible with the Ramzi theory, just wanted to wish you luck tomorrow! enjoy seeing your little bean again
    08 09 12


  8. #8
    Thanks hon, appreciate it
    2007 2010 2012



  9. #9
    Dream Vet
    Indira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    960
    Good luck tomorrow, I hope you will enjoy seeing your little baby.
    6 3
    swayed for a


  10. #10
    pics from 12 week scan this morning, baby dated at 13+1 weeks. Any ideas? sure I saw a boy nub but now looking at the pics I'm not so sure....still have a bit of hope that this is a girl, am I totally wrong?Name:  12 week scan Jan 2012 001.JPG
Views: 1134
Size:  1.01 MBName:  12 week scan Jan 2012 002.JPG
Views: 470
Size:  1.08 MBName:  12 week scan Jan 2012 003.JPG
Views: 497
Size:  960.2 KB
    Last edited by indigoviolet; January 30th, 2012 at 10:13 AM.
    2007 2010 2012



Page 1 of 8 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •