Aww no please don't quit guessing! It seems most scans are done in transverse so the mirror image way of guessing would still work just fine. It is only 97% accurate at the best of times so 3 out of every 100 scans will have the baby on the opposite side which is a lot really if you think how many thousands of women get scanned. Xxxxx
Results 91 to 100 of 307
Thread: Ramzi's Method
-
September 30th, 2013, 03:32 PM #91
-
September 30th, 2013, 03:36 PM #92
-
September 30th, 2013, 09:52 PM #93Dream Vet
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 532
luvlyjewels boy!
DHME
DD1-2003DD2-2005
DD3-2012
Our family is complete.
-
October 1st, 2013, 11:27 AM #94
-
October 1st, 2013, 09:20 PM #95Dream Vet
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 532
DHME
DD1-2003DD2-2005
DD3-2012
Our family is complete.
-
October 2nd, 2013, 12:13 AM #96
-
October 7th, 2013, 07:59 AM #97
I received an email from "Dr Ramzi". I have no way to verify it is in fact Dr Ramzi but here is what he asked me to post-
Greeting to all of you...please note that it is not the baby position we look for. It is the placenta position to the sides not placenta height from cervix but the placenta sidedness is more to the right or more to the left side ? and that MUST be done in true transverse section, when you see the ultrasound picture the right side of the picture to you is the mother left side, and the left side of the picture to you is the mother right side. in trans abdominal scan, dont look at the position of the baby. and if you have trans vaginal scan it is the same reverse if the scan was done in pie shape where the widest angle is in the bottom, and if the technologist flip the image and make the widest part of the pie in the upper scan it is not mirror image any more. so please read the research carefully and enjoy , please remember that it is not the gender that important but it is your health and the health of the baby and the gender is just a bonus.
DR SAAD RAMZI ISMAIL, THE AUTHOR OF RAMZIS THEORY AND RESEARCH PAPER.ALBERTA- CANADA
He also says it is NOT accurate before 9 weeks because the placenta has not formed to see it on u/s.
-
October 18th, 2013, 05:05 AM #98Big Dreamer
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 384
10-18-2013 3:58 AM
toomanyboys
Here is my US from yesterday at 7 weeks 4 days ( baby measured 7 weeks 3 days). It was transabdominal!!! Please take a good look for me please I think at one point I seem to see the uterus as I think you can see the cervix going towards the right if viewed from the side and it seems like baby is lying on top of my cervix!!!! Please any experts out there or anyone with vast experience as I just never seem to have understood the ramsey theory!!!! Thanks in advance!!!
http://www.ibabyscan.com/ibabyscan/v...7-9e99c65b3fd4
married for 18 years!!!!
ME '74 DH '69
MUM to 5 happy active talented fiesty'00, '04, '06, '12, 14 and 1
'08. GD PART OF MY LIFE NOW. Accepted and enjoying life with my kids! Now in my early 40's still a small glimmer of hope to possibly be blessed with another pink bean, however, more of a fantasy then a deliberate attempt. On coil and not planning anymore. Don't think I could handle GD now.
-
October 20th, 2013, 06:08 AM #99
-
October 21st, 2013, 05:49 AM #100Big Dreamer
- Join Date
- May 2011
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 384
Lol.....hopefulmonster...I wish I was toomanygirls but am toomanyboys instead.....thank you so much for your input....it's strange people post all their ramzy ultrasounds and get so many responses....I actually got a video of it you would think people would take more time to guess. If I knew how to recognize the positions and a bit more of a thorough understanding of ramzi theory which keeps giving me confusing info on the net I would figUre it out myself...but it's good to get a couple of opinions to see if the majority think the same. Thank you again.....
Last edited by toomanyboys; October 21st, 2013 at 05:52 AM.
married for 18 years!!!!
ME '74 DH '69
MUM to 5 happy active talented fiesty'00, '04, '06, '12, 14 and 1
'08. GD PART OF MY LIFE NOW. Accepted and enjoying life with my kids! Now in my early 40's still a small glimmer of hope to possibly be blessed with another pink bean, however, more of a fantasy then a deliberate attempt. On coil and not planning anymore. Don't think I could handle GD now.