Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Odd, I agree with you 3+ seems regarded as a big family in my circle IRL. With me starting to talk about having a third my 1 child mums think I'm mad and they're both pregnant and the 2 children Mums think I'm madder. Of course most of them have BG or GB so I kind of feel like their seeing their family as complete. If I had BG or GB I'd not beon this site tbh and I don't know if I'd want a 3rd as badly.
    Plus-size SAHM of 2 c-section babies DD1 Aug '09; DD2 Dec '11 chemical May 2014
    WTT for no. 3

  2. #12
    Dream Vet
    Boysway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,684
    When I had DD#4 (keeping in mind DD#2 is an angel watching over us). In my government payments we got a small amount of money for being a large family at THREE kids?! I did not understand. I even rang them up to make sure they just paid me wrong. Nope, looks like the government classifies you a big family at 3 kids, in Australia.
    '01 model (my baby girl forever 5mths '02 model)
    '05 model '10 model '15 model

    My gender dreaming success arrived safe July 2015. He is a complete dream come true and an absolutely beautiful little boy.


    A huge thank you to Atomic for all her encouragement when I was up against things out of my control and ready to chuck it in. I can never thank you enough. Thank you also to all the other knowledgeable and ever supportive ladies that have helped and encouraged me. I truly believe my dream would not have come true without this site, my boy gender plan and the incredible love and support.

    http://genderdreaming.com/forum/trying-conceive-boy/27056-he-diet-faq.html

  3. #13
    I have conflicting views. I agree that 4 is not large to me because I am the oldest of 7 children so large is 7+ to me, but I will agree that in societal standards any number over 3 kids is considered a large family because you do have to have a bigger vehicle to fit everyone when you all want to go to the same place.
    DSS #1 (2006)
    DS #2 (2007)
    DS #3 (2009)
    (April 2012 @7weeks)
    (July 2015 @7weeks)
    (Jan 2016 @9weeks, identical twins)


    Ttcing in 2016. Praying for a little to complete this household of boys!! But another boy would be loved!

    My FF Ovulation Chart


  4. #14
    Dream Vet
    motherofboys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    1,117
    I don't feel 4 is large, maybe because both dh and I are one of 3, and I know several people with 4 or 5 kids, or even 8 and 10. But I do get asked "did you always want a big family" I guess when the number of children you have starts making things tricky (the hotel rooms or fitting into vehicles) then you have graduated to a large family. But personally I'd have thought 6 plus which was what I wanted, but DH has now said just 1 more, making our number 5.
    Feb 2006 Oct 2007 March 2010 Oct 2013

    Hoping the future holds a for us......

  5. #15
    Definitely think 6+ is what I consider large. 4 seems a nice number and hopefully I'll have 4.

    Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
    Plus-size SAHM of 2 c-section babies DD1 Aug '09; DD2 Dec '11 chemical May 2014
    WTT for no. 3

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. If you have or grew up in a "large" family....
    By begonia in forum Chit Chat Lounge
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: November 18th, 2013, 08:45 PM
  2. 30.5 weeks, please just humor me and look!!
    By nestof3 in forum Ultrasound Gender Prediction
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: October 1st, 2012, 05:51 PM
  3. why such a large variance is stats
    By Lassie1982 in forum 2WW Gathering Place
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: June 24th, 2012, 03:03 PM
  4. Oops, my bad, lol, but DD #2 didn't see the humor in it
    By tinksmagic in forum Gender Disappointment
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: February 20th, 2012, 11:32 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •