Ivf michigan told me that they will not do Microsoft bc it doesn't give proven results. They said they haven't done it in years?
I am confused
Results 11 to 19 of 19
Thread: IVF michigan + MicroSort
-
December 6th, 2017, 06:14 PM #11Mama to 2 DS
and 2 DD
and 1 angel DD
-
December 6th, 2017, 07:35 PM #12
(2010)
(2013 LE sway opposite) HT
(HRC 2018)
Cycle 1 HRC Nov 2015: 9 retrieved, 6 mature, 5 fertilized, 4 biopsied, 2 normal XY = NT
Cycle 2 HRC Mar 2016: 13 retrieved, 12 mature, 11 fertilized, 9 biopsied, 6 normal = 5 XX, 1 XY!
FET #1 Aug 2016: Chemical
FET #2 Nov 2016 Immune protocol: BFP! HB at 7 and 10 weeks. No HB at 12 weeksMiscarriage.
FET #3 Aug 2017 Immune protocol: BFP!
arrived May 2018
-
December 6th, 2017, 07:40 PM #13
-
December 6th, 2017, 07:43 PM #14
Just to add:
The original poster's husband flew to Mexico himself to have Microsoft done on his sperm and then had the sorted sperm shipped to Michigan to be used during her ivf cycle. For all the extra expense and trouble, the resulting gender split was equivalent to what you could get without having a sort done as she ended up with 1 XX and 1 XY.(2010)
(2013 LE sway opposite) HT
(HRC 2018)
Cycle 1 HRC Nov 2015: 9 retrieved, 6 mature, 5 fertilized, 4 biopsied, 2 normal XY = NT
Cycle 2 HRC Mar 2016: 13 retrieved, 12 mature, 11 fertilized, 9 biopsied, 6 normal = 5 XX, 1 XY!
FET #1 Aug 2016: Chemical
FET #2 Nov 2016 Immune protocol: BFP! HB at 7 and 10 weeks. No HB at 12 weeksMiscarriage.
FET #3 Aug 2017 Immune protocol: BFP!
arrived May 2018
-
December 7th, 2017, 10:11 AM #15
-
December 7th, 2017, 03:33 PM #16
It doesn't as you can see from the story of my friend who got a boy with a Microsort of 93% or something like that.
Microsort DOES NOT reliably work and really is terrible for the sperm. This is ok if doing IVF/ICSI but not for any natural conceptions. And because of this, Microsort failed their FDA trials and is not used in this country any more.!!! Questions??Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
December 7th, 2017, 03:35 PM #17
THANK YOU
Let me just point out that when using ICSI, they select a sperm (and no one can tell the difference between X and Y sperm at a glance regardless of what Dr. Shettles claimed) and inject it into the egg. It could still be X or Y!! Microsort ~may~ weed some out but you absolutely completely and totally can still get X or Y regardless of the sort!!!! Questions??Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
December 7th, 2017, 03:37 PM #18
And plus this ignores the question of, "If Microsort is really this hard on sperm (which we know that it is) then could there not be possible results like more abnormals anyway"
So you could possibly end up shooting yourself in the foot with MS - let's say you could have had 4 boys and 3 girls without Microsort, but you end up doing Microsort and getting 1 boy and 2 girls instead because there is some unknown issue with the sperm...you may end up with more girls than boys that way but still less girls than you might have had otherwise!
This is speculation but the rates of conception with MS/IUI were piss-poor and it's believed to be because MS is sooo hard on sperm!!!! Questions??Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
December 7th, 2017, 04:43 PM #19
Similar Threads
-
Any help for Michigan?
By 3littleladies4me in forum High Tech Family Balancing non-Member ForumReplies: 1Last Post: June 5th, 2016, 08:17 PM -
Michigan couple gave birth to 12th son!
By Loveychoc in forum Gender Swaying General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: August 10th, 2013, 02:03 PM