Thanks hun. I have been addicted to looking at classic boy nubs today and im perhaps in total denial (i was like this with ds2) but it seems to me that most confirmed classic boy nubs show the line and the protrusion above to be of a similar brightness to each other. I really feel like mine is much more faded than the line below.
What does anyone else think about that? be honest not kind!!!!
Results 21 to 30 of 42
-
April 13th, 2012, 02:30 PM #21
2007
2010
2012
2015
-
April 13th, 2012, 02:33 PM #22
The bit above is deffinately not the same brightness it is alot more faded x
Mummy to 6 beautiful boysand expecting our
-
April 13th, 2012, 02:43 PM #23Dream Vet
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 735
Well I always give my honest opinion. I hate to say it, but I'm leaning blue. Hope you prove me wrong!
-
April 14th, 2012, 10:13 PM #24Dream Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2011
- Posts
- 568
When do you go for an update?
and
along the way.
Due with aafter prayer and and slight swaying.
"It must take quite a man to knock the balls off a boy!"
-
April 15th, 2012, 11:09 AM #25
-
April 15th, 2012, 11:53 AM #26
Good luck. I really hope this is your girl.
-
April 15th, 2012, 12:33 PM #27
-
April 15th, 2012, 01:40 PM #28
I think girl actually - you can see in the bottom pic that the legs are "up" so what else could that stronger white line be?
-
April 15th, 2012, 01:57 PM #29
2007
2010
2012
2015
-
April 16th, 2012, 10:07 AM #30
This is 50/50 from me, I can see both cases where it could be a boy or a girl. I hope you get us better U/S pic and hope all is well on Tuesday.