mummypink
November 30th, 2012, 06:07 PM
Hi,
I am 99% certain that my tech was right and I'm having another boy, but just out of interest I wondered if anyone knew how accurate sideways profile ultrasound images are to tell gender at 19 weeks compared to potty shots?
I really wanted a potty shot but the tech didn't do one at all and stuck to sideways profiles for pretty much everything. It looks pretty obvious that there are boy bits there but of course as I was hoping for a girl part of me wonders whether it could be swollen girl bits. Is that less likely to be the case on a sideways profile?
Also I heard somewhere that the testicles don't descend until later than 20 weeks but on my scan pic it looks like you can see them sitting inbetween the legs as you can see from the 'money' shot she gave us here:
6803
I think I am just grasping at straws because my other two boys were so much clearer on the ultrasound. This time I thought it was a boy earlier on in the scan but wasn't sure if I had just seen the cord. Everyone I have shown this to so far as said definitely a boy so I know it most probably is, and I'm actually coming round to that idea but I just wondered why the tech only did a profile shot and not a potty shot which would surely have shown everything very clearly? xx
I am 99% certain that my tech was right and I'm having another boy, but just out of interest I wondered if anyone knew how accurate sideways profile ultrasound images are to tell gender at 19 weeks compared to potty shots?
I really wanted a potty shot but the tech didn't do one at all and stuck to sideways profiles for pretty much everything. It looks pretty obvious that there are boy bits there but of course as I was hoping for a girl part of me wonders whether it could be swollen girl bits. Is that less likely to be the case on a sideways profile?
Also I heard somewhere that the testicles don't descend until later than 20 weeks but on my scan pic it looks like you can see them sitting inbetween the legs as you can see from the 'money' shot she gave us here:
6803
I think I am just grasping at straws because my other two boys were so much clearer on the ultrasound. This time I thought it was a boy earlier on in the scan but wasn't sure if I had just seen the cord. Everyone I have shown this to so far as said definitely a boy so I know it most probably is, and I'm actually coming round to that idea but I just wondered why the tech only did a profile shot and not a potty shot which would surely have shown everything very clearly? xx