-
March 11th, 2012, 02:29 PM #1
True? early ov=boys, late ov=girls
I thought I read this in one of the in-gender study links, that early ov (short follicular cycle) usually results in boys and the opposite results in girls. Has anyone found this to be right? I have a pretty reg cycle, 26-28 days and I tend to ov on/between day 10-14 with a 14 day luteal phase. Would that be considered early or late? Hoping to conceive a girl later this year. Thanks!
-
March 11th, 2012, 03:12 PM #2
I have never heard of that to be honest. But wishing you much luck!
Our long awaited is here!!!!!
-
March 11th, 2012, 03:26 PM #3
-
March 11th, 2012, 03:31 PM #4
Think I have a long cycle, about 35 days O about 18 and I have three boys. Not sure about his one?
Love and Light x
2004
2007
DS-2011
Please:
-
March 11th, 2012, 03:44 PM #5
I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that this theory was proven untrue...
In my own case, I O'd on day 17 and have a boy.
-
March 11th, 2012, 04:09 PM #6
There is at least one study which suggests this may be the case. However, I always O'd on day 14 and that's how I got 3 boys. While swaying (and messing my cycles up!) I O'd on day 12 and conceived a girl!
2005 2007 2009 2012
-
March 11th, 2012, 06:12 PM #7
I ovulated on day 15 for my first son and day 20 for my second. So I certainly wouldn't consider either of those early ovulations.
2005
2009
2013 (my pray+sway baby girl is here!)
-
March 11th, 2012, 07:11 PM #8
I ovulated on days 20 and 21 for my two boys
and IVF/PGD
Cycle #1 - Antagonist protocol
AFC=24
5/30: start stims (187.5 gonal f), 6/2: decrease gonal to 150 add 1 vial menopur , 6/5: add 2nd vial of menopur, 6/6: add ganirelix, 6/9: no meds, do trigger, 6/11: ER 21 retrieved, 13 mature, 13 fertilized, 9 biopsied, 6/16: transferred 1 XX...bfp! Betas: 10dp5dt 283, 12dp5dt 807, 19dp5dt 8762, 7/21: 7w5d HB 155!
-
March 12th, 2012, 09:14 AM #9
there is a study that showed that girls are conceived from OV that is, on average, a few days later than for boys:
http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/con...3/611.full.pdf
-
March 12th, 2012, 10:50 AM #10Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,158
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
This is one of those topics where there is something there in terms of the science, but SOOOO many exceptions that no one needs to stress over it whatsoever.
I strongly suspect that it's more likely that people with regular cycles tend to have more boys, and people with oddball cycles (or in months when you have oddball cycles) are more likely to have girls. However, this "rule" is complicated by people with PCOS who often have very long cycles and have more sons due to higher testosterone levels.
Basically, the reason why the cycles are short/long can't be overlooked - if your cycle is suddenly long because dropping estrogen levels making it harder to ovulate or very short because your body has stoped making excessive testosterone and has begun focusing more on progesterone and estrogen, then both those scenarios can mean you're more likely to conceive a girl. On the other hand, if your cycle is long because you have PCOS (even mild and undiagnosed) and you are making scads of testosterone that is interfering with ovulation, you would be more likely to conceive a boy.
These hormones are very complicated so please let me know if this is not clear.!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
Results 1 to 10 of 32
Hi I think I conceived on libra moon sign and I heard that means boy? :( As the moon orbits the earth and passes through the zodiac, it enters male and female phases every couple days. By tracking...
Moon signs