-
September 19th, 2016, 08:50 PM
#1
Dreamer
Unintentional abstain and it's time for our attempt
Due to DH being sick, and some other reasons, we have not BD in a couple weeks. I should be ovulating within the next 2 days. My DH is 46. I know Atomic doesn't recommend attempting after a period of abstinence for older men, due to quality of sperm.
I haven't gotten a positive opk yet, but I probably will tomorrow. I'm thinking the best thing for us to do is to BD tonight with protection, and again tomorrow night for our actual attempt, since the sperm will be fresher. What do you guys think?
Thanks!
Last edited by Katt2275; September 19th, 2016 at 08:53 PM.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
September 19th, 2016, 09:30 PM
#2
Moderator
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
September 19th, 2016, 09:42 PM
#3
Dreamer
Thank you XX!
-
September 19th, 2016, 11:11 PM
#4
Dream Vet
Pregnant with baby GIRL #2, due August 2019
Successful girl sway, born in 2017.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
September 20th, 2016, 01:37 PM
#5
Swaying Advice Coach
I realize this is done now but I would have NOT had the protected attempt and just gone for it.
Sperm is weird stuff, it is NOT "made fresh" every new day and that abstain actually harmed the second batch of sperm too (if it did, in fact) So by chucking that first batch, all you did in essence was reduce numbers. Now I still think you should absolutely try anyway, but it didn't "fix" the issue with abstain and may have simply reduced the likelihood that you'll get pregnant from this attempt.
The reason I am down on abstain is NOT because it is "everyone who uses iit will have a baby with 17 heads" but because I do not think it's flawlessly safe as a sway tactic. So I warn people off of it not because it is a surefire (or even high chance) way of having a baby with issues, it's because there is a distant chance of that. Since abstain does nothing anyway, why NOT try to avoid a distant chance, you know?? But it is not something that you should skip a month because of, either. I hope that makes sense it's a bit hard to explain.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
September 22nd, 2016, 07:25 PM
#6
Dreamer
Originally Posted by
atomic sagebrush
I realize this is done now but I would have NOT had the protected attempt and just gone for it.
Sperm is weird stuff, it is NOT "made fresh" every new day and that abstain actually harmed the second batch of sperm too (if it did, in fact) So by chucking that first batch, all you did in essence was reduce numbers. Now I still think you should absolutely try anyway, but it didn't "fix" the issue with abstain and may have simply reduced the likelihood that you'll get pregnant from this attempt.
The reason I am down on abstain is NOT because it is "everyone who uses iit will have a baby with 17 heads" but because I do not think it's flawlessly safe as a sway tactic. So I warn people off of it not because it is a surefire (or even high chance) way of having a baby with issues, it's because there is a distant chance of that. Since abstain does nothing anyway, why NOT try to avoid a distant chance, you know?? But it is not something that you should skip a month because of, either. I hope that makes sense it's a bit hard to explain.
Atomic, Thanks for your feedback. I'll definitely follow your advice on it in the future. I was trying to be extra cautious. I wasn't sure how important it is to use newer sperm. I had remembered seeing something about the risk involved when older men abstain for too long. At my age though, since the risk is small, I'd probably be better off focusing on the best chance of conceiving. Thanks again.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
September 23rd, 2016, 09:03 PM
#7
Swaying Advice Coach
It's probably vanishingly small, but my way of thinking is, if we CAN avoid even a vanishingly small risk, why not, since it doesn't sway anyway it doesn't appear. I hope that makes sense. I'm being conservative with something that has been used as a sway tactic, it is NOT that I think that for 999 out of 1000 people that this causes any harm at all.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
So happy for you Treens, congratulations Sent from my SM-A225F using Tapatalk
Healthy baby girl :)