June 2018 TTC & 2ww thread

[ABC.2606]

50mg, I only got it for swaying. Although he gave it to me because I have shorter luteal phase. I’m wondering if I should try taking it from CD1 that’s what fertility specialist told me to do, but I thought that comes with higher chance of multiples. He has lots of twin pregnancies. At this stage I’d love two or three [emoji15] because soon I’m out and won’t even get a chance [emoji22]


https://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/35220b

Oh ok - I didn't know if it was just for swaying or b/c you also need help ovulating and in that case I thought maybe you'd need a higher dose if you still weren't ovulating. BUT - hopefully it will happen soon!! Like you said maybe LE and weight is causing the delay. That little egg needs to pop out already!

[emshe]

Oh ok - I didn't know if it was just for swaying or b/c you also need help ovulating and in that case I thought maybe you'd need a higher dose if you still weren't ovulating. BUT - hopefully it will happen soon!! Like you said maybe LE and weight is causing the delay. That little egg needs to pop out already!

I didn’t think I did, but maybe I do!


https://www.fertilityfriend.com/home/35220b

[Pbn3]

Mummy2boys didn't you have a bfp cycle where you first weeks temps were close to coverline? Similar to this chart?

[kittendreams]

Just popping in to check on you girls sending sticky bean vibes your way and crossing everything June is full of well deserved bfps xx

[gafan]

I haven't read everything above yet, so not sure this is relevant but I was interested to learn this week from atomic that 2 attempts in fertile time might be pink enough. She said:
"One attempt has 67% success and 2 has 65% right now, so not a huge difference (of course, these numbers don't really tell us how much number of attempts sway, my point is just that 2 attempts cannot be megablue given that)"

Whoops sorry! But yes technically it puts you at two attempts. Still pink but better conception odds. E4d (96 hr version) which is what you've done so far is higher pink but lesser conception odds so what uf you stick to that instead if dh is able to?

Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

[HGmama]

Feeling your frustrations eshme!!!

Day 7 of flashing. However my wondfos are approaching positive. This am's was strange. At 3 mins it was barely there and then went back and it was almost even with the control. CD 14. Do I just have lots of estrogen? Why can't our bodies be on a schedule? Or at least close to a schedule?

[HGmama]

Time to laugh at Hgmama's attempt at LE on Friday, June 1st. Yes, in third person because I'm that embarrassed that I cant figure out how to eat LE. I guess I'm addicted protein and fat, and not getting enough fiber.

[atomic sagebrush]

Are you counting the protein and fat in higher carb vegetables and fruit, and ANYTHING in lower carb veg (the non-sweet/starchy ones???) Higher carb veg (including potatoes!!) and fruit are FREE for protein and fat, and lower carb veg are free and unlimited for everything and so when people track on line, you will have to compensate for that. That's generally what happens when people can't stick in the limits, they're counting things that they don't need to be counting.

[atomic sagebrush]

I haven't read everything above yet, so not sure this is relevant but I was interested to learn this week from atomic that 2 attempts in fertile time might be pink enough. She said:
"One attempt has 67% success and 2 has 65% right now, so not a huge difference (of course, these numbers don't really tell us how much number of attempts sway, my point is just that 2 attempts cannot be megablue given that)"




Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk

Just to clarify, based on past history I do still believe that 1 attempt is better overall than 2. Our stats get very muddy since the people who are super fertile and able to get pregnant with one attempt may be more "set" for blue and those who have gone on longer (not to mention longer on diet) without getting pregnant may be more "set" for pink and so I use the overall view of success with one attempt dating back to 2010 to go off of and NOT the 67/65%. Repeat, I do not think that those numbers are giving us an accurate representation of 2 vs. one attempt.

But given our results of late where 2 attempts is not much lower than the one has been, it is clear that 2 attempts is not in any way a dealbreaker especially for people who have been trying for quite some time. I do not want anyone to look at those numbers and now think "oh ok I will START OFF doing 2 attempts because 65 is barely less than 67" NO. I still want everyone to start off on one attempt, I think starting with one attempt is better, but at some point it is time to go to more attempts and thus my point is please don't hesitate to go to 2 attempts when it's time to go to two attempts because the people who have gone to two attempts (virtually all of whom had first tried one attempt for several months, and been on diet several months) have not had substantially worse results than those who got preggo with one attempt.

I hope this makes sense - it's a bit tough to understand.

[gafan]

Thank you for being super clear, Atomic.

Just to clarify, based on past history I do still believe that 1 attempt is better overall than 2. Our stats get very muddy since the people who are super fertile and able to get pregnant with one attempt may be more "set" for blue and those who have gone on longer (not to mention longer on diet) without getting pregnant may be more "set" for pink and so I use the overall view of success with one attempt dating back to 2010 to go off of and NOT the 67/65%. Repeat, I do not think that those numbers are giving us an accurate representation of 2 vs. one attempt.

But given our results of late where 2 attempts is not much lower than the one has been, it is clear that 2 attempts is not in any way a dealbreaker especially for people who have been trying for quite some time. I do not want anyone to look at those numbers and now think "oh ok I will START OFF doing 2 attempts because 65 is barely less than 67" NO. I still want everyone to start off on one attempt, I think starting with one attempt is better, but at some point it is time to go to more attempts and thus my point is please don't hesitate to go to 2 attempts when it's time to go to two attempts because the people who have gone to two attempts (virtually all of whom had first tried one attempt for several months, and been on diet several months) have not had substantially worse results than those who got preggo with one attempt.

I hope this makes sense - it's a bit tough to understand.

Sent from my SM-G930U using Tapatalk