Is there any study that backs this up - do people think their is any truth to it?
Basically "they" say an early BFP indicates a girl and a later BFP indicates a boy.
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thread: Early BFP and gender?
-
January 29th, 2013, 04:58 AM #1
Early BFP and gender?
-
January 29th, 2013, 05:04 AM #2
-
January 29th, 2013, 05:08 AM #3
-
January 29th, 2013, 05:11 AM #4
To me it doesn't tie, I mean surely an early BFP is only linked to earlier implantation.
Also the study I have seen showed higher HCG in women over 13 weeks so again it wouldn't correlate to an early BFP.
-
January 29th, 2013, 09:11 AM #5
I hope it's true in my case as this is the first time I've had a BFP this early, but I hope it's not true in your case! I've definitely seen people get BFPs at 8DPO and have boys. Do a search on Fertility friend, there are pregnant with a boy charts there with BFPs at 8dpo.
-
January 29th, 2013, 12:17 PM #6
It's not true with ds3 I got my Bfp at 8dpo with afternoon pee and he is def a boy
-
January 29th, 2013, 12:39 PM #7
Thanks for that
It's funny the things you read and think 'pah' then niggle in the back of your mind
-
January 29th, 2013, 12:57 PM #8Big Dreamer
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Posts
- 257
I've gotten BFPs at 9 dpo with both. The only correlation for me is that my very late BFPs are more likely to miscarry. But I had a clear positive at 9 DPO and great betas with a chromosomally abnormal boy and a chromosomally normal girl both. At this point in pregnancy there's no way of telling.
Hcg levels have been shown to be higher in pregnancies with girls, but only later on--I think the earliest a study has claimed to find a difference was after 5 or 6 weeks, and it's more likely that the difference isn't there until closer to 11 or 12 weeks. And even then, it's a general tendency, not a guarantee of gender for any particular pregnancy.
Early BFPs that darken over the next few days are a good sign in terms of a healthy pregnancy, but really have nothing to do with gender.
-
January 29th, 2013, 01:03 PM #9
it can mean that... but it's not the rule
the reason for the theory is that girls have higher hCG than boys so will show on a test sooner after implantation, but an early implanting boy at 5/6dpo will have higher hCG than a girl implanting at 9/10dpo
-
January 29th, 2013, 05:18 PM #10
Doesn't work for me. My BFPs with my healthy pregnancies have been at 10DPO (4 days before AF was due), 8DPO, and 8-9DPO (not 100% which one). They have been boy, boy, girl pregnancies. My second was a twin pregnancy and had similar betas to both of my singletons. So I don't know that any of that makes a difference so early on. But it's fun to think about
A: "Owner" of the following brood:
-Our biggest surprise dude (L: 2009)
-Our rainbow little man (K: 2011)
-Our sway and pray little diva (J: 2013)
-Our lucky charm guy (S: 2015)
We may be done, we may come back for one more sway. Time will tell. At the moment, we are very content with our family!
Similar Threads
-
Early Gender Scan? To pay or not to pay...that is the question
By Jadis in forum Due in June, July, August 2013Replies: 40Last Post: January 7th, 2013, 03:30 PM -
Early gender guess.
By jkburns04 in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 2Last Post: October 9th, 2012, 07:38 PM -
Early BFP's and Gender
By Jewelbare in forum 2WW Gathering PlaceReplies: 14Last Post: September 13th, 2012, 04:19 PM -
When I have my scan at 8+4 how to guess gender so early?
By chocolate in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 12Last Post: January 21st, 2012, 11:56 AM -
The Pink or Blue Early DNA Gender Test, anyone tried????
By littlebee3 in forum Gender DisappointmentReplies: 2Last Post: September 27th, 2011, 11:07 AM