Was the tech right??

[alohaqt4]

Hi there. I'm new to this board AND to this NUB theory stuff. Last week at my first trimester screening the tech said 80% it was a girl!! I go to a high risk perinatologist who does this a lot, so I was THRILLED...but now I'm nervous and doubting! The first pic is a potty shot, which I understnad isn't super reliable at 12 weeks 4 days...but that was what she showed me. The second is what I "believe" is a nub...but I'm not really sure. I'd love any input you all have to give!! THANK YOU!!!!!!

[alohaqt4]

I can't get them any bigger...weird!

[alohaqt4]

okay...I *think* they are bigger now...there are two pictures...they are just really small in two of them!! Sorry, like I said, I'm new to all of this!

[My Fabulous Children]

Last pic maybe girl

[alohaqt4]

Any more quesses....puleaaaaaase help me out!!!!!!!!!!

[plumkrazy]

I'm no expert and new to this myself, but your bottom pic looks similar to one of mine and I've been getting a lot of girl guesses based on one of my other pics. If that's any help? If you upload the images to photobucket and then copy the img code in your reply, the pics might show up larger and it will be easier to see the nub.

[Flava]

I think

[laury1986]

the nub looks flat, that means girl, but you cant tell by a potty shot that early because boy and girl are made the same at that stage but you can tell with the nub theory and its 80% accurate a 12 weeks. I would still say a girl because of the nub.

[Typical_Jules]

girl on last pic

[alohaqt4]

So I have a question then...why would an EXTREMELY experienced ultrasound tech. say GIRL because of a picture between the legs at 12 weeks?? Do you think she looked at the nub and just used the potty shot because she didn't think I would know about the nub theory(which I didn't at the time)?? I guess I just wonder why you would even guess, let alone say 80% girl if you knew you couldn't tell by that shot that early...odd!!