How accurate is Ramzi theory?

[business.woman]

I hope its your girl Nahri !
Unfortunately for me the baby was in the middle at 6 weeks and the tech said we cant see where the baby atached ! (I guess she just didnt wanna bother herself to look)
So I cant prove Ramzi theory is correct for me or not !

[Nahri]

The only reason I know is because I could clearly see the cord and followed it to the edge. Its hard at that gestation without super nice new expensive equipment. At this hospital it was definitely none of those LOL I could barely see a shadow of the yolk and on my DS ultrasound its a perfect outline with detail because they had top notch brand new equipment there. with a teeny tiny bean the older stuff just cant get that great of detail at that gestation. Sometimes you can tell by looking for an indent or thicker part of the wall but you can't always see it.

[business.woman]

U cant realy tell alot from this shot , this was at 6w 6 days

[business.woman]

Btw it was vaginal

[kaseybaby]

You can't see the yolk sac in this 6 week U/S so you can't tell according to ramzi. It isn't where the baby is, but where the yolk sac/placenta is located.

[atomic sagebrush]

update, businesswoman is having a BOY!

[Makali]

Hi,

Excuse for crashing the thread. Atomic sage has kindly referred me here due to my intensive questioning of the theory. I'm glad this method didn't work for you business woman.

I would also like to add that my daughter's placenta was attached to the right at my 18 week scan (even though this may be invalidated by Ramzi enthusiasts as being too late). I question this 'moving around' business and just about everything this gentleman has to say.

Please feel free to check out my thread on this site, if interested:

http://genderdreaming.com/forum/ultr...ne-debunk.html

[atomic sagebrush]

Makali, I love it that you're quesitoning this - it is one of those things I've always meant to tackle and never had the time before.

[YayBaby678]

Sorry to dig up an old thread but I don't see how this didn't work for OP, it seems like it was accurate for her. She said at her 5 week scan the yolk sac was on the left side of the screen, which would mean it's actually on the right, meaning boy. The scan where she saw it on the left of the screen was at 9 weeks 5 days, which is past the point where the Ramzi theory should be used. In the photo she posted above from 6w 6d, the placenta appears to be on the left side in the photo, meaning its actually on the right.

I'm not trying to overanalyze this but it seems in so many cases that this theory is right, even though it's been said here that its been debunked. I had my first scan today and based on Ramzi's theory, it looks like I'll be having my third boy so I'm looking for hope that Ramzi could be wrong, but it just doesn't seem to be the case. I mean I know there are cases where this hasn't been 100% accurate (I know XX said her DS3 was on the left) but it definitely seems to be right in the majority of threads I've looked at where actual scan photos are posted from the correct gestation period. So many people say it's wrong but who knows if they had their scan later, should have flipped the image, etc... But if the photo is posted along with the info, its seems to be right more often than not.

[XXforhubby]

I know several people who have paid money to have Ramzi himself read their images and have been told wrong! Some of those people are members of this forum and some are friends IRL. I’m telling you- it’s not accurate at all. At my last 2 children’s scans I’ve asked the techs which side the placenta is on and both times I was told that the theory is a joke and to wait for a nub shot from my NT scan. No joke! I can say that intuition is also way wrong! My “feelings” were only right for my DS1, haha! I had a strong feeling I was pregnant with our 4th boy and my DD is very much a she!

Hang in there!


8/2010 6/2013 11/2015
10/2017

Thank you Gender Dreaming for our precious little girl!