Results 21 to 30 of 31
-
January 13th, 2015, 03:34 PM #21
-
January 13th, 2015, 04:05 PM #22
-
January 13th, 2015, 05:41 PM #23
I didnot know if it worked for me or not , under its rules at 6 weeks baby was in the middle and I couldnt tell where the placenta is
But , at 9 weeks the yolk sac was at the left and Im having a boy !!DD in 2010
a successful Boy sway at 2015
Swaying for another boy
-
January 14th, 2015, 03:54 AM #24
Congratulations on your boy! According to your signature you're getting what you want sans x2.
I understand that there are certain genetic conditions that are passed down to one specific gender in some families which may warrant an early test for gender but A) they're not that common and couldn't be used to conduct a thorough research. B) Most of those families opt for the sure method of blood tests and amniocenthesis to ascertain the gender because i)they don't know about the Ramzi theory and ii)most would prefer to be absolutely sure rather than leave it to the guess of a pseudo scientist.
-
January 14th, 2015, 11:44 AM #25Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,146
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
January 14th, 2015, 11:57 AM #26Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,146
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
I totally get "internet tone" and I read and answer hundreds of posts a day and have replied to nearly 50,000 questions on this site alone, so when something comes off as "hot" to me I don't think my tendency is to overreact. I believe that it was unintentional and I'm not concerned about it. Happens to the best of us sometimes when we feel passionately about something, and like I mentioned above, I like the enthusiasm as this is def. something I'd love to tackle but don't have the time.
Here is the abstract for the study I refer to, this group of researchers has done quite a lot of interesting study into gender ratio The ovulation pattern during three consecutive menstrual cycles has a significant impact on pregnancy rate and sex of the offspring
I am certainly not saying this "proves" Ramzi, or any such thing BUT simply that sometimes, it is better to be "lucky than good" and researchers may stumble onto a real phenomenon but are mistaken on some aspect of how or why it works, and that the above study ~might~ end up to explain some of Ramzi's (alleged) observations.Last edited by atomic sagebrush; January 14th, 2015 at 12:01 PM.
!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
January 14th, 2015, 12:11 PM #27Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,146
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
There are some actual charlatans out there charging hundreds to thousands of dollars for gender swaying and "early gender prediction" methods that don't work. The reason why it is hard for me to get super worked up over Ramzi is a) he actually published his findings for review by other researchers which most of these scam artists do not, and b) he has not really profited hugely off doing this. He hasn't opened up a bunch of "Ramzi Ultrasound Clinics" all around the world and charging people thousands of dollars for ultrasound (which he could and there would be lines around the block) I think he's wrong, but I don't think he's evil like some of these people are.
There are literally dozens of "windmills in need of tilting at" in this universe and of all of them, Ramzi is really pretty harmless. Yes, gals do obsess unneccesarily over their ultrasounds but if they don't have an ultrasound to obsess over, they obsess over symptoms and cravings and ring tests and psychics and the way they're carring their baby.
RE pseudoscience, it is possible to be scientific and wrong - Dr. Shettles was wrong about timing intercourse as a method of gender swaying, but he was a scientist (and a darn good one). I agree that dreams about the Virgin Mary (IMO) are not necessarily reassuring or scientific, but at the least Ramzi has published his findings for independent review and to me, that's more scientific than a lot of those schmucks out there who take people's $$ without doing that.!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
January 14th, 2015, 12:17 PM #28Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,146
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
it all reminds me of Dr. Ericsson and the "sperm spinning" method - no one can replicate his findings except for people in his clinics who were "specially trained" - even the best trained people on the planet couldn't get it to work unless they worked at one of his clinics! But like I said, he bugs me way more than Ramzi does because he opened clinics around the world and charges people tons of money for the priviledge.
!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
-
January 16th, 2015, 02:25 PM #29
Well, I'm unable to debunk him this time. My daughter is attached to my left and my son to my right. But I'm certainly not going to take my 2 year old for MRI's to try and find some kind of fault with her because her placenta was attached to my right.
Pseudo scientist or legitimate researcher - it's unprofessional for him to make claims that his theory is 'right' or there's something wrong with your baby.
I just hope that there aren't any other women with a more vulnerable disposition who may potentially freak out over his claims. LoL
-
January 17th, 2015, 12:48 PM #30Swaying Advice Coach
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- Eastern Washington State, USA
- Posts
- 108,146
- Post Thanks / Like
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
You kind of do tho because he says "my method doesn't work on twins"
that he should not say that to people.
Thank you for updating!!!! Questions?? Check out the NEW and improved Complete Index !!!
If you appreciate my help with your sway plan, please consider a donation:
https://www.paypal.com/donate?hosted_button_id=C92U9TVWTRTDQ
Similar Threads
-
Ramzi theory
By business.woman in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 4Last Post: November 18th, 2014, 04:07 AM -
Gender Predictions ramzi theory/nub theory?
By nowitstwo in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 6Last Post: October 28th, 2014, 06:39 PM -
Gender Predictions ramzi theory/nub theory?
By nowitstwo in forum Gender Swaying General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: September 26th, 2014, 05:48 PM -
Ramzi theory please
By bloom78 in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 4Last Post: October 20th, 2013, 12:20 PM -
Ramzi's Theory?
By cookiemac in forum Ultrasound Gender PredictionReplies: 11Last Post: August 28th, 2013, 12:03 AM
Hi everyone, I gave birth to my first lovely daughter in September. I was wondering what would be the best timing to start trying for another girl? Would that be a year after giving birth, 18 months...
Best timing for ttc girl after...