-
February 5th, 2012, 08:15 AM #11
Hi Grasshopper - I had 3 lines for my 3rd boy I obsessed over them big time. I will dig up the images and post.
2005 2008 2010
2012
-
February 5th, 2012, 05:34 PM #12Dream Vet
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 5,262
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 1
- Downloads
- 0
- Uploads
- 0
-
February 5th, 2012, 06:00 PM #13
Sorry - just seeing your question to me now. No the lines weren't angled they were all straight and spaced evenly just like a classic girl shot - except that the middle line didn't line up with the others. It started almost at the same level that the two outside ones ended (sort of like this shape =- but the middle line was longer and extended back more). Does that make sense?
Step (17)
Step (15) & (12)
Our IVF/ICSI twins (6) (OHW)
Our HT DD (2)
14Cycle 1 (Dr Lin, CA): ER 14 Jan 2011. 5 eggs, 4 mature and fertilised w/ ICSI. 2 probe. Put back 2 XX's. 5dp5dt - BFP. 9dp5dt - 64. 13dp5dt - 81 Stop meds. 19dp5dt - 330. 22dp5dt - 890. 3 scans show small empty sac not progressing. Final scan before D&C at 7w5d shows HB 116 & a 5.5mm embryo measuring 6w1d. 8w4d - HB 144 & fetus is 11.5mm! 9w4d - no HB.....
Cycle 2 (Genea): ER 8 July 2011 (after 10 wks on DHEA). 9 eggs, 5 fertilised w/ ICSI, 2 embryo's sent for aCGH day 6 biopsy. 29 July - both normal XX's!!!
Cycle 3 (Genea): Natural FET 15 March 2012. 4dp5dt BFP. 9dp5dt - 251. 12dp5dt - 949. HB 133 @ 6w3d. Born 6 Nov 2012.
-
February 7th, 2012, 10:50 PM #14
Cinss...I would be thrilled if it was just a foot. I honestly think we were looking at the right thing but I keep feeling it was the wrong angle...the 3 lines were very bright/clear but the rest of the image was very busy...no distinct areas so I wasn't sure where bottom started and legs began.
MM...that does make sense...it sounds similar to what I saw but the lines all seemed to start level at the base but the middle line may have extended a little further out than the other two. That's the only thing keeping a flicker of hope alive. Maybe it was just a crap angle.
I am about to make a phone call to see if I can get hold of my ultrasound pics...they are sent away to be analysed and they don't actually ever give us the scans apparently, just a report. If I want the scans then I have to get hold of the company myself and make my own arrangements with them. So I guess I will go do that now. Thanks ladies.DD#1 - 06 DD#2 - 08 DD#3 - 12
3 x cycles at SART - unsuccessful
Moved on from HT - tried naturally
Beautiful baby girl # 3 born in May
-
November 11th, 2012, 11:43 AM #15
Hoping for a boy, but tech said girl. Currently in denial
-
November 11th, 2012, 11:46 AM #16
I need to see these ultrasound pictures, but I can't because I ned to post 8 more times
-
November 11th, 2012, 01:30 PM #17
-
November 11th, 2012, 01:37 PM #18
RQ10 - you should post your own pictures. You can see other people's pictures, just not signatures until you reach 10 posts. The original poster didn't post her ultrasound pics.
Girl,Boy,Alien - did you post your pics? Going to look now!Proud mom of 3 sweet boys...
and one BEAUTIFUL little girl!
(Thanks Atomic!)
Guess my nub? LOL...
http://genderdreaming.com/forum/ultr...guess-3-a.html
-
November 11th, 2012, 01:42 PM #19
-
November 12th, 2012, 11:53 AM #20
this is my DS3 14 week u/s...
and here's his 20 week...
I obsessed over the 14 week hoping that it was wrong and that it could be a hamburger bun but nope, he's ALL BOY.My family is complete!!!
2/2000
6/2003
4/2011
7/2013
Swayed for a
Results 11 to 20 of 20
Hello, Atomic hopefully you will see this! It has definitely been a while. I am not TTC, my cycles have been MIA for over a year, I'm quite certain. I have not been charting but haven't had it....
Not sure where to ask not TTC