-
September 30th, 2013, 03:32 PM
#91
Big Dreamer
Aww no please don't quit guessing! It seems most scans are done in transverse so the mirror image way of guessing would still work just fine. It is only 97% accurate at the best of times so 3 out of every 100 scans will have the baby on the opposite side which is a lot really if you think how many thousands of women get scanned. Xxxxx
-
September 30th, 2013, 03:36 PM
#92
Dream Newbie
What would mine be? 7 weeks 6 days
'04
'06
'11
'14
with a very special baby
due August 2017!
-
September 30th, 2013, 09:52 PM
#93
DH
ME
DD1-2003
DD2-2005
DD3-2012
Our family is complete.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikes
-
October 1st, 2013, 11:27 AM
#94
Dream Newbie
Originally Posted by
3littleladies
luvlyjewels boy!
I really hope you are WRONG 3littleladies
'04
'06
'11
'14
with a very special baby
due August 2017!
-
October 1st, 2013, 09:20 PM
#95
Originally Posted by
luvlyjewels
I really hope you are WRONG 3littleladies
Me to, but you see I use to think when it was transvaginal you don't mirror image the photo, so I would have said Girl for you, but hopefulmonster has made it clear that all u/s are mirror images.
Honestly don't lose hope because its definitely not always correct.
DH
ME
DD1-2003
DD2-2005
DD3-2012
Our family is complete.
-
October 2nd, 2013, 12:13 AM
#96
Dream Newbie
Originally Posted by
3littleladies
Me to, but you see I use to think when it was transvaginal you don't mirror image the photo, so I would have said Girl for you, but hopefulmonster has made it clear that all u/s are mirror images.
Honestly don't lose hope because its definitely not always correct.
You are right definitely could go the other way, I've had mixed opinions on ramzi. I have my nt scan next week and if I see a boyish nub then it'll be a little more definite.
'04
'06
'11
'14
with a very special baby
due August 2017!
-
October 7th, 2013, 07:59 AM
#97
IVF Advice Coach
I received an email from "Dr Ramzi". I have no way to verify it is in fact Dr Ramzi but here is what he asked me to post-
Greeting to all of you...please note that it is not the baby position we look for. It is the placenta position to the sides not placenta height from cervix but the placenta sidedness is more to the right or more to the left side ? and that MUST be done in true transverse section, when you see the ultrasound picture the right side of the picture to you is the mother left side, and the left side of the picture to you is the mother right side. in trans abdominal scan, dont look at the position of the baby. and if you have trans vaginal scan it is the same reverse if the scan was done in pie shape where the widest angle is in the bottom, and if the technologist flip the image and make the widest part of the pie in the upper scan it is not mirror image any more. so please read the research carefully and enjoy , please remember that it is not the gender that important but it is your health and the health of the baby and the gender is just a bonus.
DR SAAD RAMZI ISMAIL, THE AUTHOR OF RAMZIS THEORY AND RESEARCH PAPER.ALBERTA- CANADA
He also says it is NOT accurate before 9 weeks because the placenta has not formed to see it on u/s.
-
October 18th, 2013, 05:05 AM
#98
10-18-2013 3:58 AM
toomanyboys
Here is my US from yesterday at 7 weeks 4 days ( baby measured 7 weeks 3 days). It was transabdominal!!! Please take a good look for me please I think at one point I seem to see the uterus as I think you can see the cervix going towards the right if viewed from the side and it seems like baby is lying on top of my cervix!!!! Please any experts out there or anyone with vast experience as I just never seem to have understood the ramsey theory!!!! Thanks in advance!!!
http://www.ibabyscan.com/ibabyscan/v...7-9e99c65b3fd4
married for 18 years!!!!
ME '74 DH '69
MUM to 5 happy active talented fiesty
'00, '04, '06, '12, 14 and 1
'08. GD PART OF MY LIFE NOW. Accepted and enjoying life with my kids! Now in my early 40's still a small glimmer of hope to possibly be blessed with another pink bean, however, more of a fantasy then a deliberate attempt. On coil and not planning anymore. Don't think I could handle GD now.
-
October 20th, 2013, 06:08 AM
#99
Big Dreamer
Toomanygirls, I'd have said girl, but that's based on baby's position, I can't tell where the placenta is so I don't know how accurate it is.
-
October 21st, 2013, 05:49 AM
#100
Lol.....hopefulmonster...I wish I was toomanygirls but am toomanyboys instead.....thank you so much for your input....it's strange people post all their ramzy ultrasounds and get so many responses....I actually got a video of it you would think people would take more time to guess. If I knew how to recognize the positions and a bit more of a thorough understanding of ramzi theory which keeps giving me confusing info on the net I would figUre it out myself...but it's good to get a couple of opinions to see if the majority think the same. Thank you again.....
Last edited by toomanyboys; October 21st, 2013 at 05:52 AM.
married for 18 years!!!!
ME '74 DH '69
MUM to 5 happy active talented fiesty
'00, '04, '06, '12, 14 and 1
'08. GD PART OF MY LIFE NOW. Accepted and enjoying life with my kids! Now in my early 40's still a small glimmer of hope to possibly be blessed with another pink bean, however, more of a fantasy then a deliberate attempt. On coil and not planning anymore. Don't think I could handle GD now.
Bump
Not sure where to ask not TTC